AIRLINK 181.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-1.04%)
BOP 11.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-2.22%)
FCCL 46.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.28%)
FFL 15.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.57%)
FLYNG 28.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.92%)
HUBC 142.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 13.15 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.15%)
KEL 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.58%)
KOSM 5.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.52%)
MLCF 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.44%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-0.5%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.84%)
PAEL 46.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.13%)
PIAHCLA 18.28 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (6.96%)
PIBTL 10.62 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.82%)
POWER 12.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.82%)
PPL 171.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.43%)
PRL 34.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.61%)
PTC 22.82 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.92%)
SEARL 95.25 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (2.52%)
SSGC 42.32 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (3.65%)
SYM 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.63%)
TELE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.82%)
TPLP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
TRG 65.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.73%)
WAVESAPP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.07%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
AIRLINK 181.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-1.04%)
BOP 11.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-2.22%)
FCCL 46.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.28%)
FFL 15.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.57%)
FLYNG 28.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.92%)
HUBC 142.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 13.15 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.15%)
KEL 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.58%)
KOSM 5.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.52%)
MLCF 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.44%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-0.5%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.84%)
PAEL 46.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.13%)
PIAHCLA 18.28 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (6.96%)
PIBTL 10.62 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.82%)
POWER 12.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.82%)
PPL 171.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.43%)
PRL 34.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.61%)
PTC 22.82 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.92%)
SEARL 95.25 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (2.52%)
SSGC 42.32 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (3.65%)
SYM 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.63%)
TELE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.82%)
TPLP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
TRG 65.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.73%)
WAVESAPP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.07%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
BR100 12,588 Increased By 72.3 (0.58%)
BR30 37,879 Decreased By -72.9 (-0.19%)
KSE100 117,316 Increased By 414.5 (0.35%)
KSE30 36,116 Increased By 183.7 (0.51%)

Should provinces lower the rates of GST on services? That’s a question mostly answered with a resounding ‘no’ by a few leading public economists in Pakistan. An oft cited argument so goes that if provinces lower their rates of GST on services, it will result in a kind of a price war and thereby negatively impact provincial tax revenues, and therefore competition over tax rates among provinces to attract mobile tax bases should be avoided because it will be a race to the bottom.

While there is surely a need for better coordination among provinces, the (tax) rate race to the bottom should not necessarily be construed as a foregone conclusion. First the Laffer Curve argument that holds true for corporate tax rate also holds for GST on services. If provincial economies grow, so will the overall tax collection.

Second, there are many other factors aside from taxes that influence business decision making. These include factor mobility or lack thereof, cost of factor inputs, market size within province, proximity to market and/or factor inputs, and overall business and economic environment prevailing in the province.

Surely all the four provinces offer various strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats on these factors. You can’t expect a telecom company to relocate its headquarters to Quetta because Baluchistan is offering lowest GST on services – not anytime in the foreseeable future at least given Baluchistan’s socio-economic indicators. Nor can ports & terminal businesses be moved to Lahore or Peshawar.

Third, provinces’ dependence on few big sectors is gradually going down. As a proxy, look at Sindh’s data. There are four big heads under which GST on services is collected: telecom, banks, insurance, and ports & terminal. By FY16, their combined contribution to Sindh’s GST on services had come down to nearly 45 percent from nearly 80 percent a few years ago – and during that period their total collection kept on growing.

That shows growth in tax collection from other sectors – and for many of those sectors geographic mobility is rather inelastic to taxes. In fact, a lot of service sectors are closely related to markets. For instance, GST on wedding halls: people will not have their wedding in another province, nor will wedding halls business move to another province because of tax rates.

The bottom line being if provinces want to lower the rates on GST, then so be it. Let businesses and consumers reap its fruits.

Lower tax rates may as well at least partially reduce the disincentives for businesses to come into at the tax net, and thereby help expand the tax base.

Once the tax base expands, there will be enough of pie for everyone to enjoy without racing to the bottom.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.