AGL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.79%)
AIRLINK 123.89 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (1.96%)
BOP 5.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.74%)
CNERGY 3.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.27%)
DCL 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.14%)
DFML 40.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.9%)
DGKC 86.61 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (2.38%)
FCCL 33.75 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (3.21%)
FFBL 66.00 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.76%)
FFL 10.16 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.09%)
HUBC 103.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.39%)
HUMNL 13.50 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.89%)
KEL 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (5.19%)
KOSM 6.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.68%)
MLCF 38.70 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (3.2%)
NBP 60.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.17%)
OGDC 178.43 Increased By ▲ 6.18 (3.59%)
PAEL 24.86 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.24%)
PIBTL 5.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.99 Increased By ▲ 9.30 (6.56%)
PRL 22.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.13%)
PTC 14.97 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.56%)
SEARL 66.65 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (3.24%)
TELE 7.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.12%)
TOMCL 35.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
TREET 13.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.48%)
TRG 50.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-1.84%)
UNITY 26.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.56%)
WTL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
BR100 9,670 Increased By 186.4 (1.97%)
BR30 29,125 Increased By 753.7 (2.66%)
KSE100 90,568 Increased By 1601.6 (1.8%)
KSE30 28,335 Increased By 507.3 (1.82%)

Defence Secretary Leon Panetta all but ruled out an apology over an air strike last year that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and badly set back efforts to improve US-Pakistani ties, saying it was "time to move on." Pakistan banned trucks from carrying Nato supplies into neighbouring Afghanistan after the air strike, a move that costs US taxpayers $100 million a month given the need to use more expensive, longer routes to the north.
To re-open the routes, Pakistan wants to impose high tariffs on Nato supplies and Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said last week that Islamabad is still seeking an unconditional apology. But Panetta, in an interview with Reuters on Thursday, suggested that past expressions of regret and condolences were enough and held out hope that troubled talks on re-opening Pakistani supply routes for the Nato war effort could succeed anyway.
Asked whether he would oppose any further apology, Panetta said: "We've made clear what our position is, and I think it's time to move on." "If we keep going back to the past, if we keep beating up each other based on past differences, we'll never get anywhere," he said.
"The time now is to move forward with this relationship, on the (supply routes), on the safe havens, on dealing with terrorism - on dealing with the issues that frankly both of us are concerned about," Panetta said. But the supply line negotiations have become wrapped in a larger debate within Pakistan about what it sees as US violations of its sovereignty, which includes everything from covert CIA drone strikes to the US incursion into Pakistan last year to kill al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
Meanwhile, US frustration about Pakistani safe havens being used by militants attacking Nato forces in Afghanistan has become more pronounced as the US military starts winding down the war effort in Afghanistan. During a trip to Kabul, Panetta, using unusually harsh language, said the United States was reaching the limits of its patience with Pakistan because of the safe havens it offered to insurgents fighting in neighbouring Afghanistan.
But in his interview with Reuters, he appeared to temper those remarks, saying: "It's a complicated and frustrating relationship. But it's a necessary relationship and one that we've got to continue to work at on both sides." At the same time, Panetta acknowledged pressures building in Congress to put conditions on aid to Pakistan.
"It's not something that we're pushing in the Congress. But the reality is that the more problems we have, the more difficult it's going to be in the Congress to continue to provide assistance without conditions," Panetta said. He also acknowledged the likelihood that a protracted cut-off of the supply routes, costing Americans millions of dollars a day, would ultimately impact aid to Pakistan as well.

Copyright Reuters, 2012

Comments

Comments are closed.