AGL 38.20 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
AIRLINK 129.30 Increased By ▲ 4.23 (3.38%)
BOP 7.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (14.6%)
CNERGY 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.72%)
DCL 8.35 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.56%)
DFML 38.86 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.07%)
DGKC 82.20 Increased By ▲ 4.43 (5.7%)
FCCL 33.64 Increased By ▲ 3.06 (10.01%)
FFBL 75.75 Increased By ▲ 6.89 (10.01%)
FFL 12.83 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (8.18%)
HUBC 110.72 Increased By ▲ 6.22 (5.95%)
HUMNL 14.03 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4%)
KEL 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.26%)
KOSM 7.69 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (7.25%)
MLCF 40.08 Increased By ▲ 3.64 (9.99%)
NBP 72.51 Increased By ▲ 6.59 (10%)
OGDC 189.18 Increased By ▲ 9.65 (5.38%)
PAEL 25.74 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (5.36%)
PIBTL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.22%)
PPL 153.45 Increased By ▲ 9.75 (6.78%)
PRL 25.52 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (4.93%)
PTC 17.92 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (9.27%)
SEARL 82.50 Increased By ▲ 3.93 (5%)
TELE 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (5.68%)
TOMCL 32.50 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.66%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.74 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (3.78%)
TRG 56.01 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2.47%)
UNITY 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (4.91%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,659 Increased By 569.2 (5.64%)
BR30 31,331 Increased By 1822.5 (6.18%)
KSE100 99,269 Increased By 4695.1 (4.96%)
KSE30 31,032 Increased By 1587.6 (5.39%)
Pakistan

IHC adjourns hearing of sugar mills case till Tuesday

  • The court remarked that National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and other institutions were authorized to conduct investigations on their own into any matter.
Published July 20, 2020

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) adjourned hearing till Tuesday on intra court appeal of sugar mills association against establishment of sugar inquiry commission.

A division bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, conducted hearing on intra-court appeal against the decision of single member bench.

During the course of proceedings, Justice Aurangzeb remarked that the inquiry report was not binding for any institution to take action, adding the single member bench had pointed out this fact in its judgment.

The court remarked that National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and other institutions were authorized to conduct investigations on their own into any matter.

If these departments start investigation on their own into sugar crisis, then who would be pointed out by the petitioners, it further said.

The bench further remarked that it would not be able to stop the department's investigations and action even if the commission's report was set aside.

Petitioners' lawyer Makhdoom Ali Advocate pleaded that this report could influence the investigation process when it would be sent to the departments officially.

The basic stance, he said, was that this report was damaging the reputation of sugar mills' owners.

He said that the report had alleged the sugar mills for increasing sugar prices illegally, to this Justice Aurangzeb remarked that it had been stated in collective manner, and no one had been named specifically.

The lawyer said the whole sugar industry had been alleged for price increase.

He pleaded that government couldn't bring changes in inquiry commission, once it had been constituted.

The commission, he said, was authorized to summon any one into the matter.

After this, the court adjourned hearing of the case till Tuesday, wherein the petitioners' lawyer would continue his arguments.

Comments

Comments are closed.