AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has granted stay to Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited against payment of Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) on the grounds that the said amount despite provision in financial statements was not charged and recovered from the customers.

According to a written order on a suit filed by Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan released on Saturday, the SHC restrained the defendants, the Ministry of Energy, the Sui Southern Gas Company and others, from taking any coercive action against the plaintiff over non-payment of installments of the GIDC arrears showing in the bill.

According to the orders, the counsel for the plaintiff submitted that his client was engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of household products and that it fell under the category of the gas consumers who had neither collected the GIDC from their clients/customers nor passed on to their clients and customers addition in the cost of goods.

The counsel stated that in the period between 2011 and 2020 the plaintiff had not paid the GIDC to the defendant, the SSGC, on the basis of injunctive orders and reported judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the Federation of Pakistan V. Durrani Ceramics and others (2014 SCMR 1630) case.

The counsel stated that the plaintiffs never collected the GIDC from their clients/customers and did not even pass it on to their clients, which is evident from the income tax returns, books of accounts and customers auditor's report.

In case, a record of the company's showing non-receiving of the GIDC from its customers/clients is not filed with the memo of the plaint, shall be filed along with statement within seven days.

The counsel stated that in similar and other circumstances, other suits including suit no 1185/2020 have been filed wherein via order dated 16-09-2020, the defendants were restrained from taking any coercive action against the plaintiffs for non-payment of bill issued to them showing arrears including disconnection of gas and prayed the court to be treated the same.

The court ordered issuance of notices to the defendants and restrained them from taking any coercive action against the plaintiffs for non-payment of installments of GIDC arrears showing in the bill till the next date of hearing. The court directed the plaintiff to pay the current bill within the due date.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.