AGL 36.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-3.92%)
AIRLINK 216.01 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (0.98%)
BOP 9.46 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.42%)
CNERGY 6.59 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.77%)
DCL 8.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.08%)
DFML 40.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.31 (-3.1%)
DGKC 99.48 Increased By ▲ 5.36 (5.69%)
FCCL 36.48 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (3.67%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (4.76%)
HUBC 126.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.51%)
HUMNL 13.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.15%)
KEL 5.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.32%)
KOSM 6.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.31%)
MLCF 44.24 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (2.93%)
NBP 60.50 Increased By ▲ 1.65 (2.8%)
OGDC 222.49 Increased By ▲ 3.07 (1.4%)
PAEL 40.60 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (3.68%)
PIBTL 8.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.24%)
PPL 191.99 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.17%)
PRL 38.60 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (1.79%)
PTC 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (2.51%)
SEARL 103.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.48%)
TELE 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.74%)
TOMCL 34.86 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.32%)
TPLP 13.60 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (5.59%)
TREET 24.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.38%)
TRG 71.99 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (2.19%)
UNITY 33.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.18%)
WTL 1.72 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 11,987 Increased By 93.1 (0.78%)
BR30 37,178 Increased By 323.2 (0.88%)
KSE100 111,351 Increased By 927.9 (0.84%)
KSE30 35,039 Increased By 261 (0.75%)

LAHORE: Non-poor households receive comparatively larger electricity subsidy benefits than poor households; therefore the government has decided to generate fiscal savings by cutting the subsidy and making transfer to poor households to give subsidies through Ehsaas programme, said sources.

According to the sources, broad-based electricity subsidy was not the right policy for serving the best purposes of poor households. Pakistan spends substantial amount of resources in electricity subsidies which aggravate budget deficit and crowd out priority sector spending. The federal government has cut the power subsidies by Rs 81 billion or 36% in the budget and it has allocated only Rs 150 billion for power subsidies this year as against last fiscal year’s allocation of Rs 226 billion. Accordingly, all types of households are likely to get hurt in the medium term from subsidy reductions. However, the sources said, when savings from subsidy reduction would be distributed among poor households, recipient households would experience comparative improvement in real income and welfare.

The sources said there is no doubt that cutting energy subsidies hurts both poor and non-poor households but poor households would be better off when targeted transfers are made to them. They added that the government is in the process of finalizing amendments to the National Electric Power Regularity Authority (NEPRA) to put in place a new mechanism for subsidies while eliminating the present mechanism of providing electricity subsidies up to 300 units per month consumption, irrespective of income levels. They said the government is planning to utilize the facility of Ehsaas programme for a direct intervention in order to reduce poverty and supporting the baseline consumers.

Proponents of energy subsidies claim that broad-based subsidies benefits poor households, who otherwise could not consume fuel and electricity at higher prices. However, the Pakistan Electric Power Company (PEPCO) sources said substantial part of broad-based subsidy benefits are captured by non-poor households. Moreover, they said, energy subsidies are crowding out priority sector public spending and aggravating fiscal imbalances.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.