AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

A major news item “Sindh CM decides to launch waste to electricity project” (BR, Oct. 10) warrants major spade-work before spending people’s tax money on such high-value environment projects.

Two decades back, we were tasked to “study” possibility of using municipal waste to provide fuel for power generation and we had visited such power plants in Chicago (USA) and noted two major issues:

  1. The “quality” of such waste was very important as the “waste-as-a-whole” must reach the power plant. We spent quite some time trying to understand how this would be possible and the “final” resolution was that the waste must be collected at source and not through “kachra mandis” as by then, all paper, card-board and similar material are picked up for direct sale and what is left is very difficult and expensive to burn. You would, thus need to collect all such waste from source/home!

  2. Due to such requirement of combusting very different materials, very expensive and high-temperature processes must be used which could be “unaffordable” and special tariff should be introduced for environmental reasons.

All that time, we were “told” that both above requirements were simply not possible and that we have “enough space” for land-fills. Why such “waste” cannot be collected from source/home is not understandable? Soon after this project study, we had an opportunity to visit Bangladesh as part of an “official” delegation and had opportunity to visit major parts of Dhaka and were really surprised to note that there was no garbage anywhere on the road or the localities we visited. Our hosts informed us that all garbage was collected from source including very home! Also, there was no way of bringing garbage outside as plastic bags were completely banned.

We need to learn a lot from our friends and for Karachi, where environmental degradation has gone to the extreme, we really need to “upgrade” our city’s planning for both garbage handling and sewage treatment (how are we accepting direct sewage discharge to the sea?).

Karachi provides livelihood to millions of Pakistanis and deserves better recognition and stronger will to solve the major issues discussed above.

ENGR. AINUL ABEDIN (KARACHI)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.