AIRLINK 188.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.34%)
BOP 12.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 7.24 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
FCCL 41.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.88%)
FFL 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.58%)
FLYNG 25.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.75%)
HUBC 132.02 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (1.48%)
HUMNL 14.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.19%)
KEL 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.86%)
KOSM 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.61%)
MLCF 47.85 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.94%)
OGDC 208.35 Increased By ▲ 5.60 (2.76%)
PACE 6.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.47%)
PAEL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (2.09%)
PIAHCLA 16.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.76%)
PIBTL 8.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.34%)
POWER 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
PPL 175.22 Increased By ▲ 3.01 (1.75%)
PRL 35.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.75%)
PTC 24.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.21%)
SEARL 96.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-0.74%)
SILK 1.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 31.77 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (3.89%)
SYM 17.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.84%)
TELE 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.19%)
TPLP 11.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.76%)
TRG 63.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.16%)
WAVESAPP 11.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.43%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.23%)
AIRLINK 188.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.34%)
BOP 12.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 7.24 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
FCCL 41.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.88%)
FFL 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.58%)
FLYNG 25.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.75%)
HUBC 132.02 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (1.48%)
HUMNL 14.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.19%)
KEL 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.86%)
KOSM 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.61%)
MLCF 47.85 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.94%)
OGDC 208.35 Increased By ▲ 5.60 (2.76%)
PACE 6.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.47%)
PAEL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (2.09%)
PIAHCLA 16.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.76%)
PIBTL 8.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.34%)
POWER 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
PPL 175.22 Increased By ▲ 3.01 (1.75%)
PRL 35.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.75%)
PTC 24.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.21%)
SEARL 96.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-0.74%)
SILK 1.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 31.77 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (3.89%)
SYM 17.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.84%)
TELE 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.19%)
TPLP 11.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.76%)
TRG 63.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.16%)
WAVESAPP 11.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.43%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.23%)
BR100 11,943 Increased By 78.1 (0.66%)
BR30 35,766 Increased By 445.1 (1.26%)
KSE100 113,460 Increased By 659.4 (0.58%)
KSE30 35,329 Increased By 292.5 (0.83%)
Pakistan

ICJ ruling in Indian spy Jadhav's case will be implemented in any case: IHC

  • Court states that it is our responsibility to ensure a fair trial in the Kulbhushan case
Published December 1, 2020

(Karachi) The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has said that the verdict of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav's case will be implemented in any case, local media reported.

The IHC issued the ruling while hearing the government’s plea seeking appointment of a defence counsel for Jadhav.

The court remarked, "It is our responsibility to ensure a fair trial in the Kulbhushan case."

It stated, “What is India’s stance in the case?”

Responding to IHC's questions, Barrister Shahnawaz quoted the high commission as saying that India’s External Affairs Ministry is holding meetings over the issue in Delhi.

Attorney General Khalid Javed Khan informed the bench that the government is willing to offer India consular access to Jadhav for a third time. The defence counsel said India is concerned over the detention of its national Muhammad Ismail despite completing his sentence.

In its last hearing, the IHC gave another chance to India to appoint a counsel for spy Kulbhushan Jadhav.

The court was informed by Attorney General Khalid Jawed Khan that the government was doing everything to ensure the International Court Justice's (ICJ) directives.

The ICJ had directed Pakistan to inform Jadhav of his rights under Article 36 and grant India consular access. The court had also ruled that Pakistan should review the case while considering its laws.

However, the AG said, New Delhi had raised several objections and deliberately did not want to be part of the court proceedings.

Comments

Comments are closed.