AGL 40.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.15%)
AIRLINK 127.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.23%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.2%)
CNERGY 4.49 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.9%)
DCL 8.76 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
DFML 41.18 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.05%)
DGKC 85.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.43%)
FCCL 33.02 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.41%)
FFBL 64.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.16%)
FFL 11.76 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.29%)
HUBC 111.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.54%)
HUMNL 14.93 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.81%)
KEL 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.77%)
KOSM 7.67 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (4.21%)
MLCF 40.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.2%)
NBP 60.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.18%)
OGDC 193.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-0.39%)
PAEL 26.92 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
PIBTL 7.44 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.2%)
PPL 153.94 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.83%)
PRL 26.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
PTC 17.10 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (5.95%)
SEARL 85.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.35%)
TELE 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TOMCL 34.36 Decreased By ▼ -2.11 (-5.79%)
TPLP 8.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.82%)
TREET 17.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.54%)
TRG 63.35 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.97%)
UNITY 27.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.6%)
WTL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.99%)
BR100 10,109 Increased By 23.1 (0.23%)
BR30 31,226 Increased By 55.3 (0.18%)
KSE100 94,908 Increased By 144.7 (0.15%)
KSE30 29,440 Increased By 29.4 (0.1%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has dismissed the petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the Drug Regulatory Authority (Drap) to regulate the medical devices. Johnson and Johnson (pvt) Limited and several other companies sought a declaration that the Drap be permanently restrained from interfering in the manufacture, import and sale of medical devices.

The court noted that the legislatures were conscious of the fact that the list provided in the definition of 'drug' under the Drugs Act was not exhaustive, hence it authorized the government to keep adding substances and devices for the purposes of the definition of 'drug' as it was deemed necessary.

The court thus dismissed the petitions as no case for interference was made out. The petitioners contented that the parliament not have legislative competence on the subject of medical devices as medical devices did not fall within the ambit of drugs and medicine.

They argued that since medical devices did not fall within the ambit of drugs and medicine, a resolution passed by Punjab Assembly under Article 144 of the Constitution on Feb 15, 2012 with reference to drug and medicine was not applicable to medical devices.

Justice Ayesha A Malik in her judgment observes that the Drap Act under section 32 provides that the Act is in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions made in the Drugs Act and any other law enforced.

The judge notes that the legislature was conscious of the fact that the list provided in the definition of 'drug' under the Drugs Act was not exhaustive, hence it authorized the government to keep adding substances and devices for the purposes of the definition of 'drug' as it was deemed necessary.

She further observes that the public is the ultimate beneficiary of the medical devices whether used at home or in a clinic or hospital, whether for cosmetics or in-vitro diagnostic purposes, there is an obligation on the respondents (government functionaries) to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical devices.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.