AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 210.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.1%)
BOP 9.48 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.78%)
DCL 8.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.68%)
DFML 42.21 Increased By ▲ 3.84 (10.01%)
DGKC 94.34 Decreased By ▼ -2.58 (-2.66%)
FCCL 34.91 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-4.09%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 15.95 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (6.69%)
HUBC 126.70 Decreased By ▼ -3.99 (-3.05%)
HUMNL 13.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.3%)
KEL 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.82%)
KOSM 6.96 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.43%)
MLCF 43.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.58 (-3.53%)
NBP 58.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.46%)
OGDC 220.00 Decreased By ▼ -10.13 (-4.4%)
PAEL 38.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-1.63%)
PIBTL 8.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.81%)
PPL 190.50 Decreased By ▼ -9.85 (-4.92%)
PRL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-2.65%)
PTC 26.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-2.34%)
SEARL 101.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.73 (-1.67%)
TELE 8.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.54%)
TOMCL 34.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.42%)
TPLP 12.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-5.62%)
TREET 25.27 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.04%)
TRG 69.19 Increased By ▲ 5.07 (7.91%)
UNITY 33.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-3.82%)
WTL 1.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-3.93%)
BR100 11,862 Decreased By -234.8 (-1.94%)
BR30 36,740 Decreased By -974.7 (-2.58%)
KSE100 110,183 Decreased By -2231.9 (-1.99%)
KSE30 34,685 Decreased By -823.1 (-2.32%)

ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has dismissed petitions of the large taxpaying companies which challenged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) orders of changing their taxing jurisdictions from the Regional Tax Office (RTO), Faisalabad, to Large Taxpayer Office (LTO), Multan, and from the RTO to Special Zones for builders and developers Islamabad.

According to the judgement of the LHC (writ petitions 52548 of 2020), a criteria has been provided for the LTOs, catchment areas have been defined and the petitioners all meet the criteria, as there is no dispute on the criteria, and the petitioners applicability to the same. In this regard, the companies are not required to be issued any notice nor are they required to be consulted on the same.

The taxpayers are obliged to the processed at the relevant LTO or RTO on the basis of the criteria set out and the defined catchment area.

Furthermore, no right of the petitioner is infringed as at best they have pleaded hardship and inconvenience, which does not violate any fundamental right, the LHC added.

A report has been submitted in the court that there are 350 cases transferred to different LTOs in Multan and Lahore, and as well as change in jurisdiction of different RTOs.

Only 122 persons have challenged their transfers and the rest have accepted the transfer of jurisdiction orders.

Chief Inland Revenue explained that all cases where the turnover is of more than rupees one billion and have a revenue contribution of Rs 20.00 million or more have been assigned to LTOs.

The object of setting up LTOs is to make the tax system more efficient, revenue responsive, large taxpayer friendly and uniformly in tax cases across geographical location.

The basic contention of the petitioners that this change in jurisdiction is illegal and beyond the scope of power given to the FBR is totally misconceived as the law specifically gives the power to confer jurisdiction, which includes the power to transfer jurisdiction from one tax authority to another, the LHC stated. Under the circumstances, there is no merit in these petitions and the same are dismissed.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.