AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 213.00 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (1.25%)
BOP 9.73 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.64%)
CNERGY 6.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.85%)
DCL 8.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.45%)
DFML 42.21 Increased By ▲ 3.84 (10.01%)
DGKC 94.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-2.55%)
FCCL 35.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-3.3%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 15.57 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (4.15%)
HUBC 127.85 Decreased By ▼ -2.84 (-2.17%)
HUMNL 13.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.3%)
KEL 5.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.55%)
KOSM 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.87%)
MLCF 43.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.58 (-3.53%)
NBP 59.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.12%)
OGDC 225.16 Decreased By ▼ -4.97 (-2.16%)
PAEL 38.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.5%)
PIBTL 8.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.84%)
PPL 195.75 Decreased By ▼ -4.60 (-2.3%)
PRL 38.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-1.57%)
PTC 26.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-2.75%)
SEARL 101.64 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.92%)
TELE 8.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.83%)
TOMCL 34.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.28%)
TPLP 13.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.07%)
TREET 25.78 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.08%)
TRG 68.79 Increased By ▲ 4.67 (7.28%)
UNITY 33.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-1.74%)
WTL 1.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.37%)
BR100 11,951 Decreased By -145.5 (-1.2%)
BR30 37,180 Decreased By -535 (-1.42%)
KSE100 111,080 Decreased By -1335.3 (-1.19%)
KSE30 34,992 Decreased By -515.8 (-1.45%)

The advantage of increasingly distributed grid (in countries where engineers are ready to think and adapt to changed security environment) is that there could be hundreds (even thousands) of power generation sources operating on a particular network to meet the equivalent size of large centralized power plant – so instead of one target (which could easily be attacked), a large number of grid-connected power sources would need to be attacked simultaneously for equivalent impact and this would be very difficult for our enemies, even though they are focused on destroying us in every possible way!

Alternatively, one “successful” attack on a central system could turn off a significantly large amount of generation and transmission but unfortunately, a lot of effort is being placed on trying to handle such possible attacks (or even operating mistakes) in large power plants through a “conventional” approach.

If both SNGPL and SSGC had continued to follow the earlier approved “Efficient” natural gas utilization in which minimum 60% thermal efficiency had to be achieved, our whole energy scenario would have been so different!

It’s time to really wake up and see how other countries are meeting the challenge and planning for the future, ensuring both Energy Security and Climate Control by ensuring Carbon Reduction targets are achieved! How can we ever solve our energy problem if we are not following the basic requirements of efficiency, as well as generation near load centres, to reduce cost of power?

(Concluded)

Engr. Ainul Abedin (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.