AGL 38.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.21%)
AIRLINK 203.02 Decreased By ▼ -4.75 (-2.29%)
BOP 10.17 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.09%)
CNERGY 6.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-7.63%)
DCL 9.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-4.1%)
DFML 40.02 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-2.72%)
DGKC 98.08 Decreased By ▼ -5.38 (-5.2%)
FCCL 34.96 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-3.82%)
FFBL 86.43 Decreased By ▼ -5.16 (-5.63%)
FFL 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-4.79%)
HUBC 131.57 Decreased By ▼ -7.86 (-5.64%)
HUMNL 14.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.57%)
KEL 5.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-6.03%)
KOSM 7.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-7.51%)
MLCF 45.59 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-3.57%)
NBP 66.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.38 (-10.01%)
OGDC 220.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.90 (-0.85%)
PAEL 38.48 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.97%)
PIBTL 8.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.88%)
PPL 197.88 Decreased By ▼ -7.97 (-3.87%)
PRL 39.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-2.06%)
PTC 25.47 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-4.32%)
SEARL 103.05 Decreased By ▼ -7.19 (-6.52%)
TELE 9.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.28%)
TOMCL 36.41 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-4.71%)
TPLP 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.15%)
TREET 25.12 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-5.03%)
TRG 58.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.50 (-4.13%)
UNITY 33.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.38%)
WTL 1.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-9.04%)
BR100 11,890 Decreased By -408.8 (-3.32%)
BR30 37,357 Decreased By -1520.9 (-3.91%)
KSE100 111,070 Decreased By -3790.4 (-3.3%)
KSE30 34,909 Decreased By -1287 (-3.56%)

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday dismissed the plea to delink the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV from the privatization process of the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (PSMC).

A division bench of the SHC, comprising Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, gave this verdict in the petition, seeking suspension of the letter dated 16.02.2015 issued by the Privatization Commission whereby the Commission took back the decision of launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV until the privatization of the PSMC.

According to the written order of the bench, the petitioners sought revival of the Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV, which was halted in 2015 due to the privatization of the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (PSMC).

According to the petitioner, the PSMC had started the Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme with the approval of the Ministry of Production, its board of directors and in agreement with the CBA in the year 1983 and launched Phase-I to Phase-III, and later on, the master plan of Phase-IV was approved, and despite its approval from the competent authority as well as the Malir Development Authority (MDA), this project could not be launched/finalized.

The petitioners emphasized that in the current bad financial condition of the PSMC, they have grave apprehension that the respondents may abandon the said housing scheme i.e. Phase-IV, and deprive the respective allottees of their respective plots and prayed for suspension of the letter dated 16.02.2015 issued by the Privatization Commission whereby the Commission took back the decision of launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV until the privatization of the PSMC.

The court inquired from the petitioners as to how they are entitled to claim such allotment in the Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme as prima facie they have failed to attach any document with the memo of the petitioner to substantiate their claim about their respective allotment of plots or execution of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV.

Petitioner No.2 who is present in person has reiterated his submissions and submitted that the PSMC has a running policy to provide land for housing to its employees.

The court observed that prima facie, the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV was a policy decision which has already been taken care of by the Secretary of Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan, whereby the request of PSMC was declined for delinking of the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme from the privatization process vide letter dated 13.04.2015.

Besides, the court noted that the subject matter in these proceedings is a policy matter and the Privatization Commission has already taken back the decision vide letter dated 16.02.2015 for the launching of aforesaid society till the privatization of the PSMC which is the policy decision.

“In the given circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the policy decision under its constitutional jurisdiction,” the bench ruled.

The court didn’t agree with the submission of the petitioners because no right of the petitioners has been established; and, prima-facie declared that under the garb of this petition they have attempted to bypass the process initiated by the respondents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.