AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) has maintained the orders issued by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ATIR) and Commissioner (Appeals) against a leading cigarette manufacturing company in the income tax references.

The IHC has issued an order in the case of the cigarette manufacturing company vs Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue (ACIR).

According to the IHC order, the tobacco company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and sale of various brands of cigarettes, who filed Income Tax Return for the years 2007 to 2010, regarding which Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue issued show cause notice alleging therein that the deemed assessment order passed by the Commissioner was erroneous and subsequently amended the assessment order deemed to have been passed by the Commissioner.

The company aggrieved thereby preferred Appeals against respective Tax Year before the CIR-Appeals which were dismissed vide Order dated 2.9.11, against which Applicant approached the Learned Appellate ATIR Inland Revenue (ATIR) in Appeals, however the ATIR upheld the decision of ACIR and that of CIR-Appeals and dismissed the appeals of the company. In view of detailed discussion, both the forums have rightly answered the question in a proper manner, as such, it is settled proposition that factual aspects and disputes could not be considered in reference jurisdiction, rather only legal issue can be raised at the High Court level, especially when factual controversy has already been resolved by the ATIR. The said income tax references were answered in negative, as such, the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate as well as by lower forums were hereby maintained, the IHC order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.