AIRLINK 195.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.67 (-1.35%)
BOP 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.69%)
CNERGY 7.33 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.55%)
FCCL 39.03 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (8.42%)
FFL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-2.42%)
FLYNG 27.54 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (9.98%)
HUBC 131.61 Decreased By ▼ -2.42 (-1.81%)
HUMNL 13.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.4%)
KEL 4.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.3%)
KOSM 6.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-4.32%)
MLCF 45.30 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.71%)
OGDC 214.51 Decreased By ▼ -3.72 (-1.7%)
PACE 6.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.72%)
PAEL 40.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-3.19%)
PIAHCLA 16.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
PIBTL 8.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.3%)
POWER 9.49 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.06%)
PPL 182.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.43 (-1.84%)
PRL 41.80 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.28%)
PTC 24.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.97%)
SEARL 103.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.65 (-1.58%)
SILK 1.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.99%)
SSGC 39.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-3.47%)
SYM 17.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-4.16%)
TELE 8.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.57%)
TPLP 12.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.01%)
TRG 65.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.67%)
WAVESAPP 11.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.42%)
WTL 1.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-3.93%)
YOUW 3.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-1%)
BR100 11,988 Decreased By -121.3 (-1%)
BR30 36,198 Decreased By -400.2 (-1.09%)
KSE100 113,443 Decreased By -1598.8 (-1.39%)
KSE30 35,635 Decreased By -564.3 (-1.56%)

KARACHI: Sindh High Court (SHC) on Friday upheld the decision of National Command and Operation Centre (NCOC) to conduct physical exams for A and AS Levels and O Level by rejecting the petitions against the decision.

A division bench of SHC comprised of Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Amjad Ali Sahito gave the decision in multiple petitions, seeking to declare NCOC decision of holding physical exams of A and AS levels, and O level unlawful and in violation of various articles of constitution.

In a written order, court upheld the NCOC decision of holding physical examination in Pakistan in line with notified schedule and also rejected the prayer for awarding school assessed grades in lieu of physical examination but in unison.

Court, however, directed to ensure the strict adherence and compliance of SOPs as per the assurances given by Cambridge Assessment International Education (CAIE).

Court observed that holding physical exams for A and AS levels and O level according to notified schedules does not infringe or intrude any fundamental rights of the petitioners.

“The petitioners cannot claim any vested right to evaluate or appraise their credentials and competence by dint of ‘school assessed grades’ and not by means of physical examination, court maintained.

Court ruled that policy decision is based on number of circumstances on facts and expert opinion, forethought and premeditation of all pros and cons and it does not seem to be arbitrary, discriminatory or violation of any constitutional, statutory or any other provisions of law.

Hence court did not find any justification or rationale to interfere in this policy decision when all arrangements have already been made for physical examination and large number of students throughout the country are geared up to appear in the examination while few students only approached to the court of law for staying the examination and hamper the entire process which is totally unwarranted and prejudicial to the interest of large number of those students who are ready to appear and making preparation religiously.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.