AGL 38.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.21%)
AIRLINK 203.02 Decreased By ▼ -4.75 (-2.29%)
BOP 10.17 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.09%)
CNERGY 6.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-7.63%)
DCL 9.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-4.1%)
DFML 40.02 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-2.72%)
DGKC 98.08 Decreased By ▼ -5.38 (-5.2%)
FCCL 34.96 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-3.82%)
FFBL 86.43 Decreased By ▼ -5.16 (-5.63%)
FFL 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-4.79%)
HUBC 131.57 Decreased By ▼ -7.86 (-5.64%)
HUMNL 14.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.57%)
KEL 5.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-6.03%)
KOSM 7.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-7.51%)
MLCF 45.59 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-3.57%)
NBP 66.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.38 (-10.01%)
OGDC 220.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.90 (-0.85%)
PAEL 38.48 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.97%)
PIBTL 8.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.88%)
PPL 197.88 Decreased By ▼ -7.97 (-3.87%)
PRL 39.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-2.06%)
PTC 25.47 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-4.32%)
SEARL 103.05 Decreased By ▼ -7.19 (-6.52%)
TELE 9.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.28%)
TOMCL 36.41 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-4.71%)
TPLP 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.15%)
TREET 25.12 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-5.03%)
TRG 58.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.50 (-4.13%)
UNITY 33.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.38%)
WTL 1.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-9.04%)
BR100 11,890 Decreased By -408.8 (-3.32%)
BR30 37,357 Decreased By -1520.9 (-3.91%)
KSE100 111,070 Decreased By -3790.4 (-3.3%)
KSE30 34,909 Decreased By -1287 (-3.56%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has estimated that approximately 25 percent of the companies in Pakistan are ‘zombie’ firms such as Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs), causing massive revenue loss by declaring losses.

The FBR has issued first of its kind report on “Zombie Firms in Pakistan and Tax Revenue Drag,” here on Tuesday.

The FBR said that there is an existence and rise of ‘zombie’ firms, which has slowed down growth in several countries including South Asia. A zombie firm is characterised as a loss-making firm that has lost the ability to generate enough profits to cover their interest payments. They survive only by repeatedly refinancing their loans. In the competitive market, zombies have to either exit or restructure. The rise of zombie congestion potentially crowds-out growth opportunities for more productive firms. Because banks have to keep financing them to keep them as active on their loan portfolios.

This also have huge implications for the lost tax potential as well from two channels. The first one is direct, where the firms are not earning or doing business at its potential level hence, there is a direct tax loss. Second, is the tax lost in terms of the opportunity cost, where the more productive firm is denied the right for financing because of financing compulsion towards these zombie firms. Hence, when these companies are unable to produce what they could have based on the availability of adequate financing, it will also create a potential loss of tax resource.

“Rarely discussed, but the concentration of zombies is the real challenge for industrial growth in Pakistan as well. The misallocation of capital to these unprofitable firms indicates that credit reallocation is not always to the healthier, innovative, and more productive firms. Using balance sheets of the listed firms, we estimate the share of these unproductive firms in the marketplace. Our estimates suggest that approximately 25 percent of firms show up as the zombie firms in Pakistan. Furthermore, roughly 47 percent of these nonviable firms exist in textile, 19 percent in chemical, and 10 percent in the cement sector. The concentration of these firms is not limited to any particular sector. They exist both in the private and public sectors. Our estimates suggest, roughly US$3 billion short-term bank credit flows to these firms annually. In a resource scarce country such as Pakistan, it is reasonable to assume that the efficient allocation of this credit could improve performance of the industrial sector,” the FBR disclosed.

The public sector enterprises appear as zombie firms as well, which again is a big challenge to banks because PSEs have faced high levels of debt or overcapacity on the back of government guarantees. These firms have created a debt cycle, as they are often forced to borrow from banks to repay interest payments. Banks lend to them because they come with a government guarantee, and even keep lending with non-performing loans. The support to zombie firms to stay alive, impairs market competition. In this situation, banks let these otherwise unprofitable firms distort competition in the economy.

They depress market prices and increase congestion of less productive firms in the market. The zombie’s distortion also impacts the overall productivity of industry and job creation that more productive firms could generate. The survival of unproductive firms for an extended period may crowd out investment opportunities, employment generation, and overall productivity of the industry that more productive firms could generate.

The FBR said that the identification of the prevalence and role of zombie firms in Pakistani economy is essential for a variety of reasons, including enhancing productivity, effective utilisation of financial resources and establishing a fair and competitive market environment. Similarly, this identification is also important from a number of angles carrying significant revenue implications.

There is a direct loss of potential tax from the zombie firms as these firms prefer to be on the lifeline credit supply and hence, do not actively progress up to their potentials and hence, incur loss of potential revenues.

Misuse of tax exemptions and tax holidays has remained a festering sore for the Pakistani economy. These exemptions and holidays are directed to achieving certain economic objective like, bringing more investment in particular sectors of economy, providing relief to a segment of economy hit by adverse circumstances, providing fillip to economic activities in less developed areas etc. Zombie firms eat up these incentives and prevent the intended benefit to reach the targeted segments of economy.

Effective and meticulous revenue forecasting is essential, both for goal-oriented development planning and robust fiscal policy. Zombie firms, by distorting economic statistics, compromise efforts for accurate revenue forecasting.

The loss of industrial productivity and overall job losses induce an indirect loss of potential taxes.

It needs to be determined whether businesses use loss declaration as tax evasion stratagem, or they actually earn negative profits.

If the firms earn negative profits for a longer time period but are continued to be financed by the banks, then risk barometer for FBR should start ringing alarm bells to investigate the possibility of the firm’s Ponzi relation with Banks for tax evasion. However, this should not distract from the contribution of banks in hard times to support firms. The role of regulators, therefore, is key to break this ongoing debt cycle (Ponzi game by firms facilitated by Banks). Devising effective regulatory measures to capture the non-viable firms in the marketplace, regulators can generate larger space for the more productive and small-medium enterprises (SMEs) to access credit. Priority in credit access to productive firms, as well as small-medium and innovative enterprises, would improve 41 the health of financial markets and may reap higher investment, employment and revenue generation in the country. The regulators may also include a crucial parameter for determining creditworthiness in the shape of firm’s tax contribution, say, in the last five years. Firms with dismal revenue records may be kept on low priority of credit extension. There is also a need of greater information integration between FBR and financial institutions for sharing credit financing details. This will help in sifting out Zombie firms and encourage more productive firms to enhance economic activity, FBR added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.

Shamsuddin Channa Nov 11, 2021 12:39pm
If FBR has so much data on these firms, why not disclose them to the public as well as to the financial institution that borrow them money. Also it should be noted that these companies are probably subsidiaries or sister companies of other large groups. FBR should also look deeper that who actually is the real owner of these companies. Perhaps the financial aid that these companies get is used somewhere else and the real companies are hiding thia data for some potential tax gain.
thumb_up Recommended (0)