AGL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.79%)
AIRLINK 129.01 Increased By ▲ 3.94 (3.15%)
BOP 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (6.86%)
CNERGY 4.62 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.82%)
DCL 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (6.19%)
DFML 38.60 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (3.37%)
DGKC 81.02 Increased By ▲ 3.25 (4.18%)
FCCL 32.58 Increased By ▲ 2.00 (6.54%)
FFBL 74.17 Increased By ▲ 5.31 (7.71%)
FFL 12.31 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (3.79%)
HUBC 109.22 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (4.52%)
HUMNL 13.98 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (3.63%)
KEL 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (8.82%)
KOSM 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.46%)
MLCF 38.12 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (4.61%)
NBP 71.00 Increased By ▲ 5.08 (7.71%)
OGDC 187.51 Increased By ▲ 7.98 (4.44%)
PAEL 25.24 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (3.32%)
PIBTL 7.36 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.94%)
PPL 151.00 Increased By ▲ 7.30 (5.08%)
PRL 25.20 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (3.62%)
PTC 17.14 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (4.51%)
SEARL 82.63 Increased By ▲ 4.06 (5.17%)
TELE 7.54 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.43%)
TOMCL 32.95 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (3.07%)
TPLP 8.47 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.18%)
TREET 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.29%)
TRG 56.56 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (3.48%)
UNITY 27.85 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.27%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,541 Increased By 451.6 (4.48%)
BR30 30,970 Increased By 1461.1 (4.95%)
KSE100 98,258 Increased By 3684.2 (3.9%)
KSE30 30,660 Increased By 1214.7 (4.13%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has sought replies from the federal government and the Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) by January 2022 in response to a petition challenging the appointment of SECP Chairman Amir Ali Khan.

Petitioner Asad Kharal through his counsel contended that the SECP consisted of five commissioners including the chairman. He said the respondent, Amir Khan, was appointed as the commissioner of SECP on December 7, 2018, without resigning from the post of executive director of SECP. He stated that the respondent tampered the record and tendered his resignation from his previous position in back date.

He said the Ministry of Finance was never intimated regarding resignation of the respondent. He also said that a person could not hold two positions governed under separate provisions of law. He further contended that the respondent was not qualified and did not have the requisite experience to be appointed as chairman. He alleged that the respondent retained his both positions for nine months till his appointment as the Chairman SECP.

The counsel, therefore, argued that the appointment of the respondent as chairman was in sheer violation of law and judgments of the Supreme Court. He, therefore, prayed the court to set aside the appointment of the respondent as Chairman SECP.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.