AGL 38.95 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.22%)
AIRLINK 204.02 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.49%)
BOP 10.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.07%)
DCL 9.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.84%)
DFML 39.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.55%)
DGKC 99.40 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (1.35%)
FCCL 35.55 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.69%)
FFBL 89.48 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (3.53%)
FFL 13.93 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.22%)
HUBC 131.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.27%)
HUMNL 13.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.21%)
KEL 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.25%)
KOSM 7.41 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.93%)
MLCF 46.40 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (1.78%)
NBP 61.50 Decreased By ▼ -4.88 (-7.35%)
OGDC 223.15 Increased By ▲ 2.39 (1.08%)
PAEL 39.30 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (2.13%)
PIBTL 8.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.8%)
PPL 199.51 Increased By ▲ 1.63 (0.82%)
PRL 39.20 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.44%)
PTC 25.88 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.61%)
SEARL 107.10 Increased By ▲ 4.05 (3.93%)
TELE 8.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.78%)
TOMCL 36.67 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.71%)
TPLP 13.97 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.6%)
TREET 25.25 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.52%)
TRG 57.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.09%)
UNITY 33.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.58%)
BR100 12,016 Increased By 126.3 (1.06%)
BR30 37,564 Increased By 207.1 (0.55%)
KSE100 111,140 Increased By 69.3 (0.06%)
KSE30 34,937 Increased By 27.9 (0.08%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday appointed Barrister Asad Raheem as amicus curiae in a petition against secret filming, recording or photographing of individuals, especially women without their knowledge or consent and sought replies from the respondents by January 12 next.

The petitioner, a social activist, Salman Sufi, through his counsel contended that there were various incidents wherein the owners of internet cafes or cinemas secretly recorded videos or photos of the activities of their customers.

He said the perpetrators uploaded the videos on websites or leaked to the general public through social media which resulted in loss of lives of many people but the culprits had not yet been identified, rather no action had been taken against them.

The counsel argued that the online offences against the privacy of individuals grew every day and needed to be curbed which infringed the inviolable right of dignity guaranteed under the Constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.