AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 35.1 (0.28%)
BR30 39,387 Increased By 124.3 (0.32%)
KSE100 117,807 Increased By 34.4 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,347 Increased By 50.4 (0.14%)

EDITORIAL: The government’s decision to introduce a bill in the National Assembly seeking to regulate the system of moon-sighting and empowering the Ruet-e-Hilal Committee is surprising, to say the least, because it runs counter to recent efforts of the ministry of science and technology to adopt modern ways of reading the lunar calendar.

The proposed law suggests the formation of a Federal Ruet-e-Hilal Committee which alone will have the power to announce anything related to sighting of the moon. It also proposes a fine of up to Rs 500,000 for anyone found violating the law. What is more, it also empowers Pemra (Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority) to cancel the licence of, or slap a fine of up to Rs 1 million on, any television channel that makes any announcement about moon-sighting before the Committee. Even courts will have to decide such cases within 60 days. The list of fines and penalties goes on, suggesting that this matter has suddenly been taken up very seriously by the government.

Surely, all this is very odd. Not too long ago when the current information minister, Fawad Chaudhary, was at the helm of the science and technology ministry, he took a number of steps to modernise the official moon-sighting mechanism; effectively trying to bring it into the 21st century.

And since the decisions of all ministries are in fact decisions of the government itself, it was believed that the PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) government was taking the initiative of introducing scientific and technological methods to the important practice of moon-sighting. Now, though, it appears that the government and the science ministry were not on the same page at all. And since Fawad’s steps were also seen as encroaching upon the traditional domain of the clergy, they naturally angered the religious lobby.

For the government to suddenly change its stance so strongly, and propose such heavy fines, will of course invite the charge that it is once again pandering to the religious right; as it has often done in the last couple of years.

But if the aim is to end all the confusion and controversy that often accompanies moon-sighting on occasions like Eid, then surely it’s far more logical, and also feasible, to lean towards science, especially since the practice is being adopted by a growing number of Muslim countries, including trend setters in the Gulf. To take the first baby steps in what would have been a substantial paradigm shift, that too at the risk of courting controversy, and then backtracking like this also gives the impression that the government is deeply confused about the direction it really wants to take.

At stake is not just the sighting of the moon on occasions like Eid, etc., but also very important things like what place should be given to technological advances and also just how much say the religious lobby should have in affairs of the state.

When the government first talked about school and madrassa reforms it was hoped that scientific and technological education would be central to both, which would ultimately develop a crop of not just talented workers, but also technologically empowered religious scholars who would appreciate the importance of science in processes like moon-sighting. Indeed, that is pretty much what most of the rest of the world is already doing. Yet we choose to move in the opposite direction, with considerable force, at the same time.

It doesn’t behove a sitting government to be so confused this late in the electoral cycle. This is, of course, hardly the first time that PTI has taken one step forward and two steps back. It seems the party still hasn’t worked out just what posture it wants to adopt. And it hasn’t got much time left to make up its mind.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.