AGL 38.96 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.25%)
AIRLINK 192.00 Decreased By ▼ -11.02 (-5.43%)
BOP 9.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-6.19%)
CNERGY 5.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-10.4%)
DCL 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-8.14%)
DFML 36.70 Decreased By ▼ -3.32 (-8.3%)
DGKC 91.50 Decreased By ▼ -6.58 (-6.71%)
FCCL 34.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-2.17%)
FFBL 83.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.93 (-3.39%)
FFL 12.58 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-9.5%)
HUBC 122.40 Decreased By ▼ -9.17 (-6.97%)
HUMNL 13.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-3.21%)
KEL 5.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-8.73%)
KOSM 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-3.03%)
MLCF 42.49 Decreased By ▼ -3.10 (-6.8%)
NBP 60.45 Decreased By ▼ -5.93 (-8.93%)
OGDC 211.45 Decreased By ▼ -9.31 (-4.22%)
PAEL 37.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-2.81%)
PIBTL 8.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-8.64%)
PPL 189.80 Decreased By ▼ -8.08 (-4.08%)
PRL 38.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-2.33%)
PTC 23.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-5.97%)
SEARL 100.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.05 (-2.96%)
TELE 8.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-9.2%)
TOMCL 35.02 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-3.82%)
TPLP 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.09%)
TREET 22.61 Decreased By ▼ -2.51 (-9.99%)
TRG 53.30 Decreased By ▼ -4.74 (-8.17%)
UNITY 32.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-3.18%)
WTL 1.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-9.94%)
BR100 11,420 Decreased By -469.8 (-3.95%)
BR30 35,297 Decreased By -2059.1 (-5.51%)
KSE100 106,644 Decreased By -4425.8 (-3.98%)
KSE30 33,498 Decreased By -1410.6 (-4.04%)

LONDON: French insurer AXA must compensate the owner of London’s Wolseley restaurant for several incidents of business interruption due to COVID-19, London’s High Court said on Friday in a case closely watched by other policyholders.

Britain’s Supreme Court ruled last year that many insurers had been wrong to deny thousands of companies, battered by the COVID-19 pandemic, business interruption payouts.

But the ruling did not cover all policy wordings and, where it deemed claims valid, some companies were disputing payout levels.

Corbin & King, the owner of London restaurants including the Wolseley and the Delaunay, was suing AXA in a dispute that hinged in part on the scope of “denial of access” cover, designed to protect insured venues that are shut by public authorities on health grounds.

Comments

Comments are closed.