AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) Dr Asif Mahmood Jah has recommended the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to exclude furniture manufacturers from the category of Tier-I retailers (big retailers) through a policy amendment in the budget 2022-23.

In this regard, the FTO has issued recommendations to the FBR for the upcoming budget (2022-23) to exclude furniture makers, low income manufactures-cum-retailers from the provisions of the section 2(43A) of Sales Tax Act, 1990.

The FTO has recommended resolution of the grievance of furniture manufacturers by extending the area limit for furniture business registered as Tier-1 retailers with the FBR.

The complaints were filed by furniture manufactures from Islamabad against the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), for exclusion of furniture business from Tier-I retailers applicable under section 2(43A) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 (the Act).

Briefly, the complainants stated that furniture shops/showrooms require a wide open space to display the bulky pieces of furniture in order to get orders from the customers, which is not meant for retail sale, however, they have to come in the tax zone because they have occupied the stipulated covered area.

As per section 2(43A) of the Sales Tax Act, shops which are situated in the air-conditioned malls or are part of national or international chain of stores or have covered area up to 1000 sq.ft. etc come in the ambit of Tier-I retailer and are required to be registered as such, but for the furniture shops/showrooms, they don’t fall in the above said category on grounds that they are mostly not located in the air-conditioned malls nor are part of national or international chain of stores nor they fall in the category of fast moving consumer goods.

Prior to budget 2021-22, the required covered area for registration as Tier-I retailer was 1000 sq.ft.

On pointation by Pakistan Furniture Association, the government enhanced the required covered area for furniture shops from 1000 sq.ft. to 2000 sq.ft. However, a furniture shop is required to have a spacious place for display.

The complainants prayed that direction be issued to the FBR to exclude the furniture shops/showrooms from the scope of Section 2(43A) of the Act and the condition of covered area may also be removed.

During investigation, it revealed that the contentions made by the complainants that application of clause (e) inserted vide Finance Act, 2019, of sub-Section 43A of Section 2 be excluded and not applied on furniture manufacturers. This is an issue related to policy matters and required intervention in the Sales Tax Act, which is beyond the jurisdiction of FBR

In view of supra, the FTO recommended to the FBR to examine this matter and to resolve this grievance of the furniture manufacturing taxpayers for creating ease in doing business and recommended that appropriate amendment in sub-section 43A of Section 2 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, be considered in favour of the Complainants and proposal for non-applicability of clause (e) of ibid may be incorporated in the forthcoming budget proposals for the year 2022-23. The complainants have appreciated intervention of the FTO in this long standing issue; due to which even low income manufacturers were being burdened with high tax due to the condition of only covered area, for selection of units as Tier-1 retailers, which in case of furniture makers, did not match with the sales of low income manufactures-cum-retailers, the FBR added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Zahid Hussain Mar 27, 2022 02:31pm
V good effort by FTO ,
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Zahid Hussain Mar 27, 2022 02:32pm
It’s very good effort by federal Tax ombudsman.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Aamir raza Mar 27, 2022 08:19pm
Absolutely right furniture making is a cottage industry n because governments didn’t want to make this industry a big industry we are at own keeping this industry alive
thumb_up Recommended (0)