AIRLINK 155.97 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.38%)
BOP 9.93 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.48%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.84%)
CPHL 83.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.8%)
FCCL 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.78%)
FFL 14.85 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.41%)
FLYNG 30.70 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.29%)
HUBC 135.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.91%)
HUMNL 12.69 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.44%)
KEL 4.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
KOSM 5.02 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 68.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-1.79%)
OGDC 200.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-1.3%)
PACE 5.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.19%)
PAEL 42.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIAHCLA 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.87%)
PIBTL 8.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
POWER 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.5%)
PPL 148.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.83 (-1.88%)
PRL 28.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.11%)
PTC 20.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.59%)
SEARL 83.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.8%)
SSGC 40.96 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.76%)
SYM 15.11 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.89%)
TELE 6.98 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.73%)
TRG 63.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
WAVESAPP 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.58%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (4.72%)
YOUW 3.49 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (2.05%)
AIRLINK 155.97 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.38%)
BOP 9.93 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.48%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.84%)
CPHL 83.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.8%)
FCCL 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.78%)
FFL 14.85 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.41%)
FLYNG 30.70 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.29%)
HUBC 135.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.91%)
HUMNL 12.69 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.44%)
KEL 4.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
KOSM 5.02 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 68.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-1.79%)
OGDC 200.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-1.3%)
PACE 5.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.19%)
PAEL 42.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIAHCLA 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.87%)
PIBTL 8.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
POWER 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.5%)
PPL 148.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.83 (-1.88%)
PRL 28.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.11%)
PTC 20.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.59%)
SEARL 83.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.8%)
SSGC 40.96 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.76%)
SYM 15.11 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.89%)
TELE 6.98 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.73%)
TRG 63.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
WAVESAPP 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.58%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (4.72%)
YOUW 3.49 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (2.05%)
BR100 12,027 Decreased By -133.5 (-1.1%)
BR30 34,965 Decreased By -391.1 (-1.11%)
KSE100 113,495 Decreased By -618.6 (-0.54%)
KSE30 34,623 Decreased By -294.1 (-0.84%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has set aside the notifications issued for delimitations made by the delimitation committees/officers for local bodies elections in different constituencies of Punjab and referred a number of petitions to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for their disposal within one month in accordance with the law.

The petitioner Tariq Iqbal and others approached the court against the decision of the delimitation committees/authorities regarding delimitation of different constituencies in Punjab.

The court said one of the fundamental steps to hold fair elections is that the process of delimitation of constituencies should be carried out by a neutral and credible body, the court added.

The court observed that the delimitation authority while conducting the impugned delimitation have failed to act reasonably, fairly and justly as required under section 24-A of General Clauses Act.

It was incumbent upon the authority to decide the objections of each objector separately on its own merit, but to its dismay it decided multifarious objections raised by petitioners evasively in a single order. Such an order is not sustainable under the law, the court held.

The court said although the authority decided the objections but they are not in accordance with the Rule. No justification or reasoning has been mentioned in the impugned order of delimitation authority. It is not a speaking order rather based on evasive grounds, the court added.

The court said the impugned order as well as the proceedings are also a gross violation of section 24-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which manifestly impresses upon the authorities to decide the cases after application of mind on the touchstone of reasonableness, which otherwise is lacking in the instant case.

The court allowing the petitions observed that the ECP under provisions of the Act, rules and the constitution has the mandate to make amendments, alteration or modification in the final list of constituencies, so the remedy against the decision of the authority provided under Section 22 of the Act can be deemed to be the ECP and referred all the petitions to ECP for their disposal in accordance with the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.