AGL 38.50 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.05%)
AIRLINK 203.49 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.23%)
BOP 10.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 6.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.14%)
DCL 9.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.3%)
DFML 39.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.92%)
DGKC 97.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.05%)
FCCL 34.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
FFBL 85.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-1.65%)
FFL 13.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.44%)
HUBC 129.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.88%)
HUMNL 14.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.57%)
KEL 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.96%)
KOSM 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.28%)
MLCF 45.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.29%)
NBP 62.25 Decreased By ▼ -4.13 (-6.22%)
OGDC 219.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.76 (-0.8%)
PAEL 39.02 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.4%)
PIBTL 8.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.47%)
PPL 195.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.88 (-1.46%)
PRL 38.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.61%)
PTC 25.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.31%)
SEARL 102.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.24%)
TELE 9.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
TOMCL 36.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.13%)
TPLP 13.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.38%)
TREET 24.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.47%)
TRG 57.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.09%)
UNITY 33.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.38%)
WTL 1.72 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.58%)
BR100 11,890 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 37,357 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 109,587 Decreased By -1483.3 (-1.34%)
KSE30 34,352 Decreased By -556.8 (-1.6%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has set aside the notifications issued for delimitations made by the delimitation committees/officers for local bodies elections in different constituencies of Punjab and referred a number of petitions to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for their disposal within one month in accordance with the law.

The petitioner Tariq Iqbal and others approached the court against the decision of the delimitation committees/authorities regarding delimitation of different constituencies in Punjab.

The court said one of the fundamental steps to hold fair elections is that the process of delimitation of constituencies should be carried out by a neutral and credible body, the court added.

The court observed that the delimitation authority while conducting the impugned delimitation have failed to act reasonably, fairly and justly as required under section 24-A of General Clauses Act.

It was incumbent upon the authority to decide the objections of each objector separately on its own merit, but to its dismay it decided multifarious objections raised by petitioners evasively in a single order. Such an order is not sustainable under the law, the court held.

The court said although the authority decided the objections but they are not in accordance with the Rule. No justification or reasoning has been mentioned in the impugned order of delimitation authority. It is not a speaking order rather based on evasive grounds, the court added.

The court said the impugned order as well as the proceedings are also a gross violation of section 24-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which manifestly impresses upon the authorities to decide the cases after application of mind on the touchstone of reasonableness, which otherwise is lacking in the instant case.

The court allowing the petitions observed that the ECP under provisions of the Act, rules and the constitution has the mandate to make amendments, alteration or modification in the final list of constituencies, so the remedy against the decision of the authority provided under Section 22 of the Act can be deemed to be the ECP and referred all the petitions to ECP for their disposal in accordance with the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.