AGL 40.30 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.75%)
AIRLINK 130.90 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (1.06%)
BOP 6.80 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.8%)
CNERGY 4.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.86%)
DCL 8.98 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
DFML 43.30 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (3.86%)
DGKC 84.05 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.33%)
FCCL 33.00 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.7%)
FFBL 78.10 Increased By ▲ 2.63 (3.48%)
FFL 11.77 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.62%)
HUBC 110.62 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.06%)
HUMNL 14.56 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (4.64%)
KOSM 8.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.43%)
MLCF 39.84 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
NBP 60.85 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.93%)
OGDC 200.10 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (0.22%)
PAEL 26.70 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PIBTL 7.80 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.83%)
PPL 160.26 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (1.48%)
PRL 26.81 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.3%)
PTC 18.65 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.03%)
SEARL 83.52 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (1.31%)
TELE 8.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.32%)
TOMCL 34.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.06%)
TPLP 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.21%)
TREET 17.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-2.63%)
TRG 59.89 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-2.33%)
UNITY 27.99 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (2.04%)
WTL 1.43 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.62%)
BR100 10,557 Increased By 150.2 (1.44%)
BR30 31,999 Increased By 285.8 (0.9%)
KSE100 98,471 Increased By 1142.9 (1.17%)
KSE30 30,651 Increased By 458.7 (1.52%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed that under section 17(A) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, a family court shall issue a decree on a suit for maintenance allowance straightaway if a defendant fails to pay interim maintenance so fixed. The court held that the right of any litigant cannot be allowed to interfere in the dispensation of justice, especially in a manner so as to endorse his repeated defiance of valid orders passed against him.

The high court issued these observations in a petition of one Naveed Akhtar, who failed not once but twice on the same count and tried to avoid and wriggle out of the liability so imposed.

The court said the social, legal and religious responsibilities of the petitioner also bind him to support his own biological daughters, provide for their maintenance, and to do so in a respectable way.

Seen from whichever angle the petition in question merits to be dismissed since the judgments under challenge are unexceptionable. Therefore, the petition is dismissed, the court ordered.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.