AGL 40.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.1%)
AIRLINK 131.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.34%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.56 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.01%)
DCL 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.04%)
DFML 41.15 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.33%)
DGKC 84.80 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.86%)
FCCL 32.69 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.08%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.76%)
HUBC 110.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.04%)
HUMNL 14.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.57%)
KOSM 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2%)
MLCF 39.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.2%)
NBP 60.70 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.68%)
OGDC 196.00 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (0.54%)
PAEL 27.05 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.35%)
PIBTL 7.52 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.53%)
PPL 156.55 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (0.5%)
PRL 26.97 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.09%)
PTC 18.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.82%)
SEARL 82.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.73%)
TELE 8.38 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.82%)
TOMCL 34.69 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.41%)
TPLP 9.16 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (3.97%)
TREET 17.36 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (3.95%)
TRG 62.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.4%)
UNITY 27.62 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.66%)
WTL 1.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (7.03%)
BR100 10,406 Increased By 219.4 (2.15%)
BR30 31,576 Increased By 239.7 (0.77%)
KSE100 97,199 Increased By 1652.5 (1.73%)
KSE30 30,157 Increased By 579 (1.96%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to dispose of pending tax refund claims for the tax year 2018 and to ensure that the commissioner concerned revisit the instant case.

The complainant was a government servant whose application for Tax Year 2018 was rejected on the basis that evidence of tax deduction was not attached with application.

The FTO sought Secretary Revenue Division for comments, the Chief Commissioner–IR RTO informed that complainants application for refund had already been rejected as there was no refund application pending.

During investigation of the subject complaint, the FTO has made observation that in the instant case order u/s 170(4) is a classical example of departmental inattention and incompetence as; one page order dated 19th August 2020 for TY 2018 categorically states at Para 3 of the order that; “Necessary evidence of tax payments is placed on record.”

However, in the concluding Para of same order, the officer opines, “that the taxpayer neither furnished any evidence regarding tax deduction manually nor attached any evidence in support of refund claimed. In view of above facts of the case, the refund application is rejected.” Contradiction and carelessness are more than evident, no opportunity of hearing was given to the aggrieved taxpayer prior to passing the rejection order.

In addition to departmental attention, tax deduction mainly relates to section 236K which was CNIC based and internally verifiable from the FBR’s portal. In view of the above, the tax ombudsman directed the FBR to pay the tax refund for the tax year 2018 to the aggrieved taxpayer as per law and the commissioner concerned revisits the impugned order for TY2018.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.