AGL 37.55 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
AIRLINK 218.49 Decreased By ▼ -4.40 (-1.97%)
BOP 10.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.29%)
CNERGY 7.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.17%)
DCL 9.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.4%)
DFML 40.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-1.49%)
DGKC 102.20 Decreased By ▼ -4.56 (-4.27%)
FCCL 34.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.67 (-7.2%)
FFL 19.50 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.35%)
HASCOL 12.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-2.73%)
HUBC 130.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.95 (-1.47%)
HUMNL 14.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.1%)
KEL 5.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.41%)
KOSM 7.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3.74%)
MLCF 45.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.73 (-5.67%)
NBP 65.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.75%)
OGDC 220.12 Decreased By ▼ -3.14 (-1.41%)
PAEL 44.25 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (1.72%)
PIBTL 9.08 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.11%)
PPL 192.28 Decreased By ▼ -5.96 (-3.01%)
PRL 41.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-1.52%)
PTC 26.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-2.56%)
SEARL 107.29 Decreased By ▼ -2.79 (-2.53%)
TELE 10.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.9%)
TOMCL 35.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-2.08%)
TPLP 14.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-3.14%)
TREET 25.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-2.53%)
TRG 67.34 Decreased By ▼ -1.51 (-2.19%)
UNITY 33.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-2.02%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
BR100 12,291 Decreased By -72.5 (-0.59%)
BR30 37,354 Decreased By -863.8 (-2.26%)
KSE100 116,637 Decreased By -482.9 (-0.41%)
KSE30 36,770 Decreased By -166.8 (-0.45%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) allowed a petition of a woman, Mahnoor Azhar, and held that a decree issued by a family court about the annual increase in maintenance would deem to have come into effect from the date of institution of the suit, not the date of the decree issued.

The court observed that the petitioners are entitled to 10 percent annual increase in the maintenance amount awarded to them from the date of institution of the suit.

It is a settled legal position that the purpose of the Family Act, 1964 is to protect the minors and women, who are considered to be part of the vulnerable segment of society, the court added.

The court observed that it would be against the interest and welfare of the minors to grant annual increase from the date of decree issued, particularly in cases like the one in hand where there is almost a gap of six years between the date of institution of the suit and date of final order passed.

The court said if the plea of the respondent, Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan, as to grant of annual increase from the date of decree is allowed, it would not only frustrate the object of the law but also put premium in the hands of a defendant. “Such an interpretation will be contrary and repugnant to the object and purpose of the law,” the court added.

The petitioners were real children, born out of the wedlock of petitioner Mahnoor and respondent Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan.

The petitioners had instituted a suit for maintenance in the year 2004, which was decreed by the family court on January 28, 2010.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Adnan May 04, 2023 10:27am
Kindly mention the case number or citation number
thumb_up Recommended (0)