AIRLINK 211.04 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (0.71%)
BOP 10.51 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.48%)
CNERGY 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
FCCL 34.42 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.09%)
FFL 18.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.28%)
FLYNG 23.30 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.66%)
HUBC 132.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.37%)
HUMNL 14.22 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.57%)
KEL 5.11 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.59%)
KOSM 7.21 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.98%)
MLCF 45.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.44%)
OGDC 219.10 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.33%)
PACE 7.70 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.58%)
PAEL 42.27 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.37%)
PIAHCLA 17.55 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.45%)
PIBTL 8.74 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.22%)
POWERPS 12.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 190.31 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (0.68%)
PRL 42.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.17%)
PTC 25.81 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.54%)
SEARL 104.17 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.2%)
SILK 1.03 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.90 Increased By ▲ 1.66 (4.23%)
SYM 19.35 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.99%)
TELE 9.43 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.06%)
TPLP 13.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.76%)
TRG 69.85 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.97%)
WAVESAPP 10.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
WTL 1.72 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.58%)
YOUW 4.21 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.69%)
BR100 12,197 Increased By 117.6 (0.97%)
BR30 36,915 Increased By 312.3 (0.85%)
KSE100 116,812 Increased By 759 (0.65%)
KSE30 36,809 Increased By 231 (0.63%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Tuesday sought reply from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) within a fortnight on a petition of former federal minister Chaudhry Moonis Elahi praying to quash a case of money laundering registered against him in the light of a report of the Sugar Inquiry Commission.

Earlier, the petitioner’s counsel contended that the impugned case and the proceedings before the FIA were a result of mala fide intentions.

He alleged that the impugned proceedings had been initiated to harass and blackmail the petitioner and his family so as to muffle their voice against the coalition government in the centre.

The counsel pointed out that the alleged financial transactions had been related to the period from 2007 to 2020 whereas the FIR had been registered in 2022. He argued that the agency failed to furnish any plausible explanation for the delay in registration of the FIR.

He stated that none of the suspects nominated in the FIR had been a public servant.

He further said that the FIR had been registered in pursuance of the sugar inquiry without issuing any summon or notice to the petitioner which showed mala fide and violation of the statutory laws.

The counsel, therefore, asked the court to declare the impugned case unlawful and quash the same.

The FIA had registered the FIR under sections 34, 109, 420, 468 and 471 of the PPC, read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and section 4 of the Anti Money Laundering Act, 2010.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.