AGL 37.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 159.80 Increased By ▲ 4.58 (2.95%)
BOP 8.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.1%)
CNERGY 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.45%)
DCL 10.05 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (5.46%)
DFML 40.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.27%)
DGKC 91.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-1.45%)
FCCL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.38%)
FFBL 78.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.14%)
FFL 13.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.18%)
HUBC 113.12 Increased By ▲ 2.93 (2.66%)
HUMNL 14.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.68%)
KEL 5.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.75%)
KOSM 8.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.72%)
MLCF 44.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-2.54%)
NBP 74.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-1.8%)
OGDC 192.00 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.07%)
PAEL 31.62 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (3.74%)
PIBTL 8.34 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.21%)
PPL 166.94 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.23%)
PRL 31.32 Increased By ▲ 1.88 (6.39%)
PTC 22.08 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (10.01%)
SEARL 97.00 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.39%)
TELE 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.54%)
TOMCL 34.31 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.15%)
TPLP 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (8.22%)
TREET 18.00 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.93%)
TRG 60.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.82%)
UNITY 32.20 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.72%)
WTL 1.52 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.4%)
BR100 11,220 Increased By 3.7 (0.03%)
BR30 33,847 Increased By 196.2 (0.58%)
KSE100 104,618 Increased By 59.1 (0.06%)
KSE30 32,363 Decreased By -2.5 (-0.01%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Tuesday sought reply from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) within a fortnight on a petition of former federal minister Chaudhry Moonis Elahi praying to quash a case of money laundering registered against him in the light of a report of the Sugar Inquiry Commission.

Earlier, the petitioner’s counsel contended that the impugned case and the proceedings before the FIA were a result of mala fide intentions.

He alleged that the impugned proceedings had been initiated to harass and blackmail the petitioner and his family so as to muffle their voice against the coalition government in the centre.

The counsel pointed out that the alleged financial transactions had been related to the period from 2007 to 2020 whereas the FIR had been registered in 2022. He argued that the agency failed to furnish any plausible explanation for the delay in registration of the FIR.

He stated that none of the suspects nominated in the FIR had been a public servant.

He further said that the FIR had been registered in pursuance of the sugar inquiry without issuing any summon or notice to the petitioner which showed mala fide and violation of the statutory laws.

The counsel, therefore, asked the court to declare the impugned case unlawful and quash the same.

The FIA had registered the FIR under sections 34, 109, 420, 468 and 471 of the PPC, read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and section 4 of the Anti Money Laundering Act, 2010.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.