AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down the Sindh government’s plea to grant a stay against the Sindh High Court (SHC)’s order regarding the formation of committees to oversee the flood relief work.

A three-member judge bench, headed by Chief Justice (CJ) Umar Ata Bandial, hearing the appeal allowed the monitoring committee, headed by civil judges, to oversee the relief and rehabilitation of the flood-affected people. The bench, however, restrained the committee from intervention and control of the relief operation and directed them to submit the progress reports to the SHC.

The SHC Sukkur and Larkana benches had formed committees to monitor the relief and rehabilitation work for the flood victims.

The Sindh provincial government had challenged an interim order of the high court in the Supreme Court, which issued notices to the concerned parties.

The apex court directed the supervisory committees to continue working for the relief and rehabilitation of the flood victims while restraining the committees formed under the chairmanship of the civil judge from interfering and controlling the rehabilitation work of the flood victims.

“The natural disaster has affected the lives of people,” observed CJ Bandial.

“The Sindh government considers the formation of committees to be an interference in the relief operation on part of the executive,” the CJ remarked, “we shall serve notices to the parties of the case”.

“Suspend the SHC’s orders alongside the notice,” pleaded the Sindh Advocate General.

“The high court has issued the decision for the protection of fundamental rights,” responded Justice Mansoor Ali Shah.

“Restraining orders will be issued if it is deemed appropriate in the future,” added the SC judge.

The three-member bench headed by CJ Bandial has adjourned the hearing until next week.

It may further be noted that earlier in September an application had been filed with the SC seeking the provision of basic rights and assistance to the flood victims in Sindh.

The plea had requested the apex court to order the complete implementation of the decision on its 2011 suo motu notice related to floods.

The application had adopted the stance that floods during the current year affected nearly all the districts of Sindh and that the provincial government and the related departments had failed to make arrangements to protect people from the calamity.

It had further noted that no pre-emptive measures were in place despite a warning by the Meteorological Department and added that floodwater remained stagnant in several areas of the province.

The plea had recalled that the apex court had taken a suomotu notice on the floods in the year 2010 and issued orders to the then government.

The petitioner had maintained that the provision of basic rights was the responsibility of the government.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.