AGL 38.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
AIRLINK 210.38 Decreased By ▼ -5.15 (-2.39%)
BOP 9.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.27%)
CNERGY 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-4.57%)
DCL 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.29%)
DFML 38.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.51%)
DGKC 96.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.33 (-3.32%)
FCCL 36.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.82%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 14.95 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.17%)
HUBC 130.69 Decreased By ▼ -3.44 (-2.56%)
HUMNL 13.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.49%)
KEL 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.34%)
KOSM 6.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-5.33%)
MLCF 44.78 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-2.38%)
NBP 59.07 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-3.61%)
OGDC 230.13 Decreased By ▼ -2.46 (-1.06%)
PAEL 39.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-3.54%)
PIBTL 8.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.15%)
PPL 200.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.99 (-1.47%)
PRL 38.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-4.73%)
PTC 26.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-5.05%)
SEARL 103.63 Decreased By ▼ -4.88 (-4.5%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.32%)
TOMCL 35.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-1.62%)
TPLP 13.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.31%)
TREET 25.01 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.58%)
TRG 64.12 Increased By ▲ 2.97 (4.86%)
UNITY 34.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.92%)
WTL 1.78 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (3.49%)
BR100 12,096 Decreased By -150 (-1.22%)
BR30 37,715 Decreased By -670.4 (-1.75%)
KSE100 112,415 Decreased By -1509.6 (-1.33%)
KSE30 35,508 Decreased By -535.7 (-1.49%)

SBP started the flexible exchange regime in 2019. At the time, the PKR/USD level was 160. The currency oscillated between 152-178 between Jul-19 to Feb-22 with an average exchange rate of 162. The market was working just fine. Then came a mega-crisis – both economic and political. The dimensions were both domestic and international. Since March 22, the currency is extremely volatile, and the general direction is one of steep depreciation where the rupee almost touched 240 twice against the dollar, currently standing at 218.

The core reason for this volatility is shortage of dollars; with political uncertainty as icing on the top. SBP took all kinds of administrative measures to bring a balance in the currency market. The central bank has asked the banks to arrange foreign currency to meet payment requirements. SBP has asked the banks to run net open position (NOP) short. And they were supposed to cover it by themselves? In the process, they asked for higher rates for buying. Today these banks are scrutinized for behaving independently while they were forced to do so by the central bank. Why did the SBP not intervene when the banks were running high spread?

Banks usually don’t run propriety positions. They are facilitators between buyers (importers) and sellers (exporters). The selling was less while buying demand was huge. SBP asked the bank to handle it. Since the market was short, the price moved up. A similar example of this phenomenon is the recent shortage of surgical mask in early days of COVID. It was selling at multiples of its normal price. That was happening in the spread of banks in the currency market. If the banks were manipulating, why didn’t the SBP ask banks to stop at that time?

The banks used to run wide spreads as they had short NOP. They were pricing the risk, as SBP was not providing the dollar. Everyone was pricing at high risk to cover shorts. This was all happening under the nose of the SBP and today when the banking profits are published, everyone is criticizing banks for manipulation and SBP has joined the crowd.

Didn’t the SBP know this? Isn’t SBP the prime responsible agency for anything related to the currency market? Whom would you blame when the law and order is bad? Of course, the authorities. Here SBP is the authority. If the macroeconomic situation gets worse, finance minister is the first to get hit. Similarly, in case of exchange market manipulation, the buck stops at SBP – the regulator. Not banks.

There are handful of commercial banks in Pakistan, and majority of banking is being done by just top ten banks. SBP is the most resourceful regulator in the country; and its main mandate is to regulate only a few banks. The interbank currency market is thin and not many transactions happen a day. SBP can keep track of all the transactions. The question is where was the SBP when the L/Cs were opening at 245 while the interbank market was in 230s. Why did the SBP have to wait for banks quarterly accounts be published and being circulated and criticized in the media before taking any actions?

The case here is to not defend banks. They could have manipulated. There are incidences where they were giving Rs7-10 discount to remitter and small exporters while charging Rs7-10 premium to importers. They milked it. The numbers are showing it. But they took the naked risk. There was no SBP to support them and had kept a blind eye on their manipulation (if any). And now the regulator is showing strong teeth. The balance is missing.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Random Guy Oct 12, 2022 02:24pm
Looks like somebody paid very well to get this published.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Moin Khan Oct 12, 2022 02:33pm
Why SBP didn't intervene earlier? Look at the political events. Apparently, PTI position became weaker for the first time (after April 9, 2022) when Eleanor Commission announced the decision on foreign funding case. Then SBP intervened in the market and made efforts to stabilise pkr parity. In my view, SBP indirectly was supporting opposition to deepen the economic crisis.
thumb_up Recommended (0)