AIRLINK 201.40 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (0.55%)
BOP 10.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 7.28 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.97%)
FCCL 35.20 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.74%)
FFL 17.57 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.86%)
FLYNG 25.63 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.14%)
HUBC 129.20 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.09%)
HUMNL 14.11 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.17%)
KEL 4.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.4%)
KOSM 7.15 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.71%)
MLCF 45.10 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.08%)
OGDC 222.66 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.23%)
PACE 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.62%)
PAEL 42.99 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.44%)
PIAHCLA 17.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.58%)
PIBTL 8.63 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.41%)
POWER 9.18 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.33%)
PPL 193.00 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.14%)
PRL 42.70 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (2.89%)
PTC 25.41 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (3.97%)
SEARL 104.26 Increased By ▲ 2.99 (2.95%)
SILK 1.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.9%)
SSGC 44.10 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.52%)
SYM 18.83 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.37%)
TELE 9.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.52%)
TPLP 13.09 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
TRG 69.03 Increased By ▲ 2.84 (4.29%)
WAVESAPP 10.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.14%)
WTL 1.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.12%)
YOUW 4.07 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.74%)
BR100 12,102 Increased By 62 (0.52%)
BR30 37,051 Increased By 362.2 (0.99%)
KSE100 115,400 Increased By 596.3 (0.52%)
KSE30 36,230 Increased By 127.6 (0.35%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that a postman is under obligation to make report about the notice of Talb-i-Ishhad on the AD card and that the same was handed over to the petitioner/vendee or he refused to receive it.

Various courts repeatedly held that intention of law is not merely dispatching of a formal notice but it must be served on the addressee, the court added.

The court said the arguments of not receiving the AD card back or that it was lost is not acceptable. In its absence, the respondent has failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of law. The withholding of the AD card compelled the court to draw adverse inference that notice Talb-i-Ishhad was not served upon the petitioner, the court added.

The court passed these observations in response to a petition filed by Muhammad Shafiq and observed that the respondent failed to prove due performance under the law, therefore, findings of the two lower courts are reversed.

The court setting aside the verdicts of both the courts held that the impugned judgments and decrees being classic example of wrong exercise of jurisdiction and misreading of evidence cannot be sustained in the eye of law.

According to the details, 13 kanals 7 marla land was sold out to the petitioner via oral sale mutation. This transaction was pirated by the respondent by filing a suit for possession claiming his superior right being Shafi Shareek, Shafi Khaleet & Shafi Jar.

The respondent pleaded that notice of Talb-i-Ishhad was dispatched to the petitioner through registered post AD. However, contents of plaint nowhere revealed that either said registered AD was delivered to the petitioner/vendee or he refused to receive the same.

The suit was decreed by trial court which was upheld by appellate court, hence this petition was filed to check legality and validity thereof.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.