AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that a postman is under obligation to make report about the notice of Talb-i-Ishhad on the AD card and that the same was handed over to the petitioner/vendee or he refused to receive it.

Various courts repeatedly held that intention of law is not merely dispatching of a formal notice but it must be served on the addressee, the court added.

The court said the arguments of not receiving the AD card back or that it was lost is not acceptable. In its absence, the respondent has failed to fulfill the mandatory requirement of law. The withholding of the AD card compelled the court to draw adverse inference that notice Talb-i-Ishhad was not served upon the petitioner, the court added.

The court passed these observations in response to a petition filed by Muhammad Shafiq and observed that the respondent failed to prove due performance under the law, therefore, findings of the two lower courts are reversed.

The court setting aside the verdicts of both the courts held that the impugned judgments and decrees being classic example of wrong exercise of jurisdiction and misreading of evidence cannot be sustained in the eye of law.

According to the details, 13 kanals 7 marla land was sold out to the petitioner via oral sale mutation. This transaction was pirated by the respondent by filing a suit for possession claiming his superior right being Shafi Shareek, Shafi Khaleet & Shafi Jar.

The respondent pleaded that notice of Talb-i-Ishhad was dispatched to the petitioner through registered post AD. However, contents of plaint nowhere revealed that either said registered AD was delivered to the petitioner/vendee or he refused to receive the same.

The suit was decreed by trial court which was upheld by appellate court, hence this petition was filed to check legality and validity thereof.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.