AGL 38.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.16%)
AIRLINK 219.00 Increased By ▲ 11.23 (5.41%)
BOP 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.88%)
CNERGY 7.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.56%)
DCL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
DFML 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.34%)
DGKC 104.52 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (1.02%)
FCCL 36.66 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.85%)
FFBL 91.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.1%)
FFL 14.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.34%)
HUBC 141.00 Increased By ▲ 1.57 (1.13%)
HUMNL 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.35%)
KEL 6.01 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.67%)
KOSM 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.65%)
MLCF 47.81 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.12%)
NBP 70.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.86 (-3.88%)
OGDC 229.25 Increased By ▲ 6.59 (2.96%)
PAEL 39.20 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (2.86%)
PIBTL 9.32 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.54%)
PPL 209.65 Increased By ▲ 3.80 (1.85%)
PRL 40.91 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.66%)
PTC 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.43%)
SEARL 110.56 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.29%)
TELE 9.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.87%)
TOMCL 38.84 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.65%)
TPLP 14.09 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.32%)
TREET 26.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
UNITY 34.30 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.47%)
WTL 1.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.6%)
BR100 12,438 Increased By 139.3 (1.13%)
BR30 39,420 Increased By 542.4 (1.4%)
KSE100 115,354 Increased By 493.1 (0.43%)
KSE30 36,380 Increased By 183.7 (0.51%)

Finance Minister Ishaq Dar must have spent the last few days, since the zero-interest surprise disappeared from the headlines, waiting for the mullah lobby to come rallying behind him; lifting his party’s, perhaps even the rupee’s, fortunes once again.

Since there’s been no serious debate about a policy that will plunge the economy into completely uncharted waters, and no serious questions have been answered – not even about the fate of crucial bailout loans, which run into plenty of interest – one can only assume that this was just one of those usual gambits for political mileage.

If that’s true, then Dar sb should prepare to cut a sorry figure on at least three separate occasions. First in front of the party bosses, who’ll be disappointed that their own Riyasat-e-Madina initiative fizzled out so quickly.

Then he’ll be grilled by banks that never trusted nor wanted this transition and businesses whose financing has suddenly, and without any consultation, become hostage to the conservative right’s obscure interpretation of the scripture. And then he will have to answer to the people.

They let his pictures from intensive care become stale news so quickly because their desperation duped them into believing in his Darnomics once again; that the rupee would march back below 200 to the dollar, that he would bend the Fund and sort out ratings agencies, and that he’d get a zero-interest economy to make pious Muslims out of us even if it pushed the country towards complete financial isolation and collapse.

Markets hate uncertainty more than anything, even bad news which is promptly priced in. And while Dar sb’s been waiting, uncertainty about the direction of the economy, especially about the IMF (International Monetary Fund) programme, has pushed Pakistan’s credit default swaps (CDS) up 1,929 basis points to 75.5 percent in a matter of days, the highest rating since data became available in November 2006.

That means the loans we constantly need to avoid sovereign default have just become a lot more scarce and a lot more expensive (higher interest). So just staying above water will require us to become more desperate for just the kind of loans that will not be sharia compliant in this Islamic republic after 2027, the Federal Shariat Court’s (FSC’s) cutoff date for the transition.

Now there’s more uncertainty down the road because FSC’s verdict didn’t shed any light on whether the country would be allowed to cross the line and borrow on interest from bi- and multi-lateral donors, or where constant bailout money will come from if it can’t, or what the government will keep pledging to continue borrowing in the domestic market. So neither the spike in CDS, nor another fall in the rupee, will stall unless there’s some clarity.

These are all very tough questions and answering them might well make the government question the FSC’s jurisdiction, or even mandate itself. It was setup by a dictator who violated his oath, executed a deposed PM, drenched his regime in religious symbolism for purely political gain and planted the seeds of all shades of Taliban that torment us to this day.

And now it is ridding the country of usury even though it didn’t, in any way, advance the very wide and still uncertain debate about when, how and in which circumstances the interest rate can be interpreted as prohibited usury.

But the hordes Dar sb’s waiting for were not cultivated to indulge in such subtleties. They are weights on a scale, meant to tilt it one way or the other and give the party or personality of preference the force of shariah compliance at the same time.

And it’s a shame that the religious sensitivities of ordinary Pakistanis, one of the largest populations within a national boundary anywhere in the world, are exploited and preyed upon to feed the political elite’s naked lust for power.

That’s why Dar sb won’t mind waiting a while longer, even throw another bone or two at them. But with CDS climbing and an election drawing near, how long can he really wait?

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Shahab Jafry

The writer can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

Comments are closed.

Usman Nov 17, 2022 10:06am
Its your right to criticize "conservative right’s obscure interpretation of the scripture" but your criticism needs to be precise and factual rather than a mere general statement. Ironically our modern days Muslim economist can not think beyond the western model of economy and finance. We need to learn from how Islamic Banking has progressed in past ten to twenty years. How have they changed their workings and terms without creating much apparent difference for the consumers.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
IMTIAZ CASSUM AGBOATWALA Nov 17, 2022 10:44am
Dar waiting for a miracle to happen. No real indepth analysis carried out to bring down exchange rate nor making environment business friendly.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Fazeel Siddiqui (Overseas Pakistani) Nov 17, 2022 11:59am
It's not only Dar, this is whole slothful nation's nature, wait & watch, let someone else do your business.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mushtaque Ahmed Nov 18, 2022 12:14am
The PDM government does not need 75+ ministers and SAPMs. We must cut this flab and reduce our current expenditure to arrest the slipping down the economic slope.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Truthisbitter813 Nov 19, 2022 11:11am
Quite ironic that while critiquing Dar's "Darnomics" as you put it, you've failed to elucidate a single reason why a Shariah Compliant Islamic Financing system cannot work in Pakistan. This is NOT a hitherto-unknown concept! Just look at the Gulf States. Heck, just have a look at Saudi Arabia. Bi-lateral and multi-lateral donors do not bother with the details; if an islamic system provides sufficient risk-cover and ROI, then they (unlike the author) would not needlessly criticize the system just because of its association with religious dogma. ps. the "obscure interpretation" that the author referred to, has a unanimous support from all fiqh of Shariah.
thumb_up Recommended (0)