AGL 38.20 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
AIRLINK 129.30 Increased By ▲ 4.23 (3.38%)
BOP 7.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (14.6%)
CNERGY 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.72%)
DCL 8.35 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.56%)
DFML 38.86 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.07%)
DGKC 82.20 Increased By ▲ 4.43 (5.7%)
FCCL 33.64 Increased By ▲ 3.06 (10.01%)
FFBL 75.75 Increased By ▲ 6.89 (10.01%)
FFL 12.83 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (8.18%)
HUBC 110.72 Increased By ▲ 6.22 (5.95%)
HUMNL 14.03 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4%)
KEL 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.26%)
KOSM 7.69 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (7.25%)
MLCF 40.08 Increased By ▲ 3.64 (9.99%)
NBP 72.51 Increased By ▲ 6.59 (10%)
OGDC 189.18 Increased By ▲ 9.65 (5.38%)
PAEL 25.74 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (5.36%)
PIBTL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.22%)
PPL 153.45 Increased By ▲ 9.75 (6.78%)
PRL 25.52 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (4.93%)
PTC 17.92 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (9.27%)
SEARL 82.50 Increased By ▲ 3.93 (5%)
TELE 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (5.68%)
TOMCL 32.50 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.66%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.74 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (3.78%)
TRG 56.01 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2.47%)
UNITY 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (4.91%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,659 Increased By 569.2 (5.64%)
BR30 31,331 Increased By 1822.5 (6.18%)
KSE100 99,269 Increased By 4695.1 (4.96%)
KSE30 31,032 Increased By 1587.6 (5.39%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court observed that collection of an unadjustable advance income tax from a person not liable to pay income tax or file an income tax return is unconstitutional. The court passed the directions on a petition of a widow challenging tax under Section 236 of the Ordinance of 2001, against cellular phone services. Unfortunately, the citizens, already being subjected to indirect taxes, are now taxed through unadjustable advance income tax which can only be termed as expropriatory and confiscatory, the court observed.

The income tax is meant to be charged on income proportionality but cannot allow to be charged in the absence or without determining the income. The court also held that the act of Parliament, levying a tax, should not offend any of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

‘FBR: dismal income tax collection

The court said putting an extra burden of compliance which is not in normal course of business and that too without remuneration or concession in tax liability, needs to be revisited by the government as well as tax administrators.

The court, therefore, referred the matter to FBR for suitable amendments within 90-days. The court also converted the connected petitions into representations and sent to the Chairman FBR, who shall forthwith consult, the Attorney General of Pakistan on the concerns and legal position. The court said needful be done within 90-days and a compliance report shall be submitted to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial).

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Iftikhar Ahmad Nov 20, 2022 10:21am
عدالت نے بہت طویل وقت دیا ہے تین ماہ کے بعد بھی اسے سیف بی آر گھسیٹے گا۔ نہ ہی سمجھیں۔ اس پر پہلے پابندی لگا دیتے تو پھر یہ اس کیس پر جلدی کرتے۔
thumb_up Recommended (0)