AIRLINK 193.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.51 (-0.77%)
BOP 9.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.33%)
CNERGY 7.53 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.31%)
FCCL 37.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-2.76%)
FFL 15.60 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
FLYNG 25.59 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.71%)
HUBC 127.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.55 (-1.21%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.24%)
KEL 4.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2%)
KOSM 6.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.17%)
MLCF 43.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.85%)
OGDC 203.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.18%)
PACE 6.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.31%)
PAEL 40.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.36%)
PIAHCLA 17.49 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
PIBTL 7.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
POWER 9.08 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.44%)
PPL 174.25 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.2%)
PRL 38.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.01 (-2.58%)
PTC 24.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-3.87%)
SEARL 107.24 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-1.67%)
SILK 0.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-2.02%)
SSGC 36.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.74 (-4.56%)
SYM 19.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-2.31%)
TELE 8.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.44%)
TPLP 11.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.89%)
TRG 64.88 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.14%)
WAVESAPP 11.63 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.03%)
WTL 1.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.59%)
YOUW 3.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 11,765 Decreased By -123.2 (-1.04%)
BR30 34,986 Decreased By -233.6 (-0.66%)
KSE100 111,487 Decreased By -543 (-0.48%)
KSE30 34,934 Decreased By -201.5 (-0.57%)

LAHORE: Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh of the Lahore High Court on Monday referred a petition to the chief justice for constitution of a larger bench as the plea challenges the jurisdiction of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to punish persons on contempt charges under Section 10 of the Election Act 2017.

Justice Abid observed that important legal points had been raised in the petition which needed to be heard by a larger bench. In the last hearing, the court had issued notices to the respondents and also sought assistance from the attorney general of Pakistan and advocate general of Punjab on the points raised in the petition.

The petitioner, Malik Shabir Ismail, through his counsel contended that the Supreme Court in multiple cases held that the ECP was neither a court nor a tribunal; therefore, the power conferred upon it under Section 10 could not be exercised being violative to Article 2014 and Article 175 of the Constitution.

The counsel contended that the ECP had not been declared or established as a court; however, the section 10 of the Act conferred power of a court, without it being established as a court. He said any order passed by the ECP in pursuance of the section 10 of the Act was challengeable before the Supreme Court.

The counsel asked the court to declare that the section 10 of the Election Act, 2017, was violative to the Constitution and restrain the ECP from taking any action or proceedings under the impugned section.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.