AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

KARACHI: Despite being victimized by dilapidated road infrastructure, high air pollution, gas shortage, ever-increasing street crime, unemployment, etc, Karachi is the only city where the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is collecting double income tax on electricity bills.

The Karachiites, who are the highest taxpaying citizens with lesser fundamental rights, are now being forced to pay double income tax on electricity bills at their businesses and residential areas.

The issue came to the surface when the field formations of the FBR issued notices to shopping malls and amusement parks in Karachi, whereby they were asked to collect income tax on the electricity bills under section 235 of the Ordinance.

Similarly, there are several gated residential societies in the district West where the developers got bulk electricity connections and distributed power to the inhabitants of the communities against highly taxed reimbursement notes, raising transparency issues.

The inhabitants of these societies are reportedly paying over Rs50-60 per unit against the electricity being supplied by the developers through bulk connections. However, it is the sole responsibility of the licensed person making the bill for power consumption not of the developers of the societies.

On the other hand, the provisions of section 235 of the Ordinance stated that there shall be collected advance tax at the rates specified in Division IV of Part-IV of the First Schedule on the amount of electricity bill of a commercial or industrial, or domestic consumer: Provided that the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to a domestic consumer of electricity if his name appears on the Active Taxpayers’ List.

(1A) In addition to tax collectible under sub-section (1), there shall be collected tax at the rates given in Division IV of Part IV of First Schedule from retailers and service providers as provided under section 99A of the Ordinance: Provided that the tax shall not be collectible under this sub-section if the tax has been collected from the person under sub-section (9) of section 3 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 as provided in the general order issued under section 99A of the Ordinance

(2) The person preparing the electricity consumption bill shall charge advance tax under sub-section (1) in the manner electricity consumption charges are charged.

It clearly suggests that the person preparing the electricity consumption bill shall collect advance tax on the amount of electricity bill of either a commercial, industrial or domestic consumption and, therefore, once the power company like KE has done the collection of tax on its bills, it cannot be further collected by the second and the third persons be it shopping malls, developers or parks.

Karachi Tax Bar Association (KTBA) has confirmed that field formations in Karachi have issued notices and asked them to collect income tax on the electricity bills under section 235 of the Ordinance.

The malls and developers, on the other hand, provide space for commercial and residential purposes but do not sell electricity to them and only install sub-meter for them and that too with the permission of KE to measure the units of consumed electricity, KTBA said.

KTBA said that the malls, developers, and parks were not engaged in the business of supply of electricity as it was not their business to supply electricity nor did they have the necessary permission (license) from Nepra under the Electric Power Act, 1997 for Generation, Transmission, and Distribution of electricity.

Furthermore, KTBA requested the chairman FBR to issue a clarification that these places are not required to collect income tax under section 235 of the Ordinance while issuing reimbursement notes for collecting the amount of electricity consumed by them, provided to them either through K-electric supply or through own back-up generators as they are neither engaged in the business of supplying electricity nor do they have any license from Nepra to do so.

It is bound to secure the amount through reimbursement note owing to the fact that KE has not installed separate meters and already charged income tax under section 235 of the Ordinance.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Muhammad Kashif Jan 05, 2023 01:37pm
The citizens of Karachi can definitely say that the FBR is behaving like an "extortionist organization" as in the past some political parties were involved in collecting extortion money. On the other hand, how many facilities the people of Karachi are getting against the heavy taxes?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
MUHAMMAD IMRAN Jan 09, 2023 01:39pm
Excellent information.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
MUHAMMAD IMRAN Jan 09, 2023 01:39pm
Excellent information.
thumb_up Recommended (0)