AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) typically imposes a series of conditions on countries that receive financial assistance from the Fund.

In general, IMF conditions may include requirements for fiscal austerity measures, such as reducing government spending and increasing revenue through tax reforms, as well as structural reforms aimed at improving the efficiency of the economy, such as deregulation and privatizing state-owned enterprises.

The IMF may also require the country to implement financial sector reforms to strengthen the banking system and promote stability, as well as reforms aimed at increasing the transparency and accountability of government institutions.

To finalize the action plan under the ninth review of the IMF bailout programme. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) imposes a series of conditions on Pakistan in order to receive financial assistance from the Fund.

The specific conditions imposed on Pakistan during the 9th review meeting are (i) allowing the exchange rate to be market determined to gradually end the foreign exchange shortage; (ii) strengthening the fiscal position with permanent revenue measures and a reduction in untargeted subsidies; (iii)scaling up social protection to assist the most vulnerable and flood victims; and (iv) improving energy provision by preventing further accumulation of circular debt and ensuring the viability of the energy sector.

The first condition has already been fulfilled; in order to resume the halted International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan programme, the government lifted an unofficial exchange rate cap on the US dollar to Pakistani rupee (USD-PKR). Market-based exchange rates help to eliminate foreign exchange shortages by creating greater liquidity, ensuring price stability, and reducing government intervention in the foreign exchange market.

According to official data, the State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) foreign exchange reserves have decreased to a risky level of $2.917 billion due to scheduled external repayment. The present level of the official reserve go below the three months import coverage, and provide import cover for only 18 days. According to the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, the country’s import bill for January 2023 was $4.856 billion (PBS).

Reducing the fiscal deficit, can be achieved by both cutting expenditures and increasing revenue. To save government spending, the government could consider reducing or rationalizing subsidies in energy, agriculture and food. Agricultural subsidies, such as those for fertilizers and seeds, could be reduced or targeted more effectively to ensure that they reach the intended beneficiaries.

The government could consider reducing food subsidies, such as those for wheat, sugar, and edible oil, which are currently given to both the poor and wealthy. As per PIDE report, Pakistan’s government allocates approximately Rs 200 billion annually to subsidize fertilizers, which aim to provide affordable essential commodities (such as wheat, rice, maize, and sugar) to low-income groups.

However, the subsidy only results in an average family of five receiving a monetary benefit of Rs 893 per year (Rs 74 per month) for their consumption of 15 maunds of wheat, 2 maunds of rice, and 30 kg of sugar. Given the subsidy’s cost of Rs 200 billion, fertilizer subsidy is not an efficient policy to provide low prices in Pakistan.

PIDE debate on civil service reforms advises the government how to control its wage bill. The government could offer reducing perks and allowances to civil servants which would reduce the overall size of the workforce and reduce the wage bill.

The PIDE report states that there is a surplus of staff in grades 1-11, which currently accounts for 85% of the salary bill. By eliminating redundant positions, such as peons, finances can be saved, which could then be used to cover any additional expenses in the event of salary revisions.

The government could offer reducing perks and allowances to civil servants. The PIDE has suggested that civil servants’ salaries must be on a par with the comparable private-sector salaries. It proposes a strategy to monetize all perks such as, government housing assets, which are valued at approximately Rs 1.45 trillion.

By releasing these assets to the private sector, the government can realize their value and remove obstacles to growth while also eliminating welfare losses. Additionally, the use of official cars by senior civil servants should be discontinued, and instead, cars should be leased from banks.

The estimated value of cars used by officers in grades 20-22 in Islamabad is approximately Rs 1.53 billion, which could be used for other purposes if the transportation facility is monetized.

Unfortunately, we know the policies that aimed at improving the efficiency of the economy but due to lack of political will and weaknesses in institutions hinder the implementations. If Pakistan successfully obtains funding from the IMF can signal to international investors and the general public that Pakistan’s economy is on the path to stability and recovery, which can lead to increased confidence and investment in the country.

But, it is very clear that IMF programmes focus on stabilisation and crisis management rather than growth-oriented policies that require structural reforms.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Hafsa Hina

The writer is an assistant professor at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) and can be reached at: [email protected]

Comments

Comments are closed.

MUHAMMAD ARSALAN JAMIL Mar 01, 2023 07:13pm
Very bookish article, did not take into consideration political economy.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Irfan Mar 01, 2023 11:44pm
what can be the effects of the taxes not paid by various entities who are engaged in financial activities making profits in the form of toll tax, border trade, and many other activities
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Abdul Basit Bhatti Mar 02, 2023 01:20pm
Insightful and comprehensive analysis.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
q Mar 02, 2023 02:14pm
failure is still failure
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Rao Tanveer Mar 03, 2023 03:01pm
All state owned entities are burdon on pakistan. No one in profit. Like Railways, Pakistan Post office, wapda, state life insurance, PIA etc. In various countries where they are in worst financial crises, they introduce voluntarily job separation scheme. In that scheme state give golden shake hand those employees who complete their 5 year job. 300 running basic are enough for their life. That amount can deposit in any national savings center for their further or future monthly household expenses. In this condition government can raise their finance from deposit in national savings amount. That is now much important to meet with pakistan financial crises.
thumb_up Recommended (0)