Modern Texas was built on oil, and its production has long been a source of immense pride. But now, areas that moved to the steady rhythm of oil derricks for more than a century are making the state a national leader in wind and solar energy.
A convergence of factors has led to this unexpected result: favorable weather (lots of wind and sun), relatively cheap land, the lure of federal clean-energy subsidies, and a desire to backstop a utility system that failed dramatically during a 2021 cold snap.
Two counties south of Dallas, Navarro and Limestone, symbolize this surprising shift. Inextricably part of the Texas petroleum industry since the late 19th century, they are now in the vanguard of the renewable revolution.
Wind and solar projects “have Navarro County leading the nation with renewables,” said the county’s economic development director, John Boswell.
Symbolizing this push is a new wind farm inaugurated last week by French multinational energy company Engie, with 88 wind turbines capable of producing 300 megawatts (MW) of power.
A half-hour’s drive to the west, in the small town of Abbott, is a 250 MW solar farm, also built by Engie that is now producing electricity.
Texas is the nation’s leader — by far — in providing clean energy to corporate and industrial buyers, at 35 percent of the national total, according to the American Clean Power organisation.
The state of Ohio has about half Texas’s number of corporate and industrial projects, just ahead of California in third place. “It’s true that when we think about Texas, we think about this very large oil and gas state,” said Engie executive Frank Demaille.
But, he added, its natural resources are not all buried in the ground.
“They’ve got lots of wind, lots of sun, and are very good at managing all their different resources.”
With its huge and sprawling petrochemical industry, a population of 30 million, and a fierce history of independence, Texas in many ways stands apart from the rest of the country — for better or for worse.
One way its go-it-alone mentality did not help became apparent in 2021, when a rare and intense cold wave swept through the state — whose power utility was not connected to two major national grids — provoking electric outages that affected millions and were blamed for more than 200 deaths.
Texas today remains primarily dependent on fossil fuels. As of early this year, gas was its leading source of energy (at 42 percent, according to Ercot, which manages the state’s electrical grid). Coal trails at 11 percent.
But renewable sources have carved out a major role.
Wind-generated power now provides 29 percent of Texas’s needs, with solar at 11 percent. The remainder comes from nuclear and hydropower.
By comparison, wind was at 24 percent just two years ago, and solar at less than 5 percent. Given Texas’s deep investments in and long history with carbon-based energy, experts don’t expect it to give way to renewables anytime soon.
“I think what you’ll see in the future is a combination of both of those, because Texas is committed to both” sources, said Jeff Montgomery, whose Blattner Energy company is behind 400 renewable projects across the country.
Texas is a major supplier of natural gas to Europe. And now, said Demaille of Engie, “because of the war in Ukraine, we’re importing more gas from the US, and especially from Texas.”
Meantime, however, legislation backed by the Biden administration and voted into law last year could accelerate the move to renewables through substantial federal subsidies.
Robert Lowry, superintendent of the Coolidge school district in Limestone County, said the tax revenues that renewable-energy projects generate can make a difference for school systems like his.—AFP
Comments
Comments are closed.