ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Monday, granted interim bail to Imran Khan, chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in seven different cases registered against him.
A two-member bench of Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb heard Imran Khan’s petition and barred the police from arresting him.
The IHC bench also issued notices to the federal government for withdrawing Imran Khan’s security as former prime minister while saying that Imran Khan’s security concerns are genuine and directed the respondents to submit a response in this matter till April 6.
At one stage, Khan came to the court rostrum saying that he wants to say something. However, the court stopped him from speaking. The bench said that he is a respectable person but be seated in his seat.
The PTI chairman moved seven separate petitions seeking interim bail in the cases registered against him at Golra, Bara Kahu, Ramna, Khanna, and CTD police stations following clashes at the Federal Judicial Complex (FJC) on March 18 when the former prime minister had appeared in the Toshakhana case.
Khan also filed an application quoting the statement of Federal Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah Khan and requested the court to refrain the respondents from their “nefarious design to take the life of the petitioner and be restrained from arresting the petitioner in order to fulfil their plan in order to meet the end of justice.”
He filed the petitions through Barrister Salman Safdar, Faisal Fareed, Intazar Hussain Panjutha, and others saying that Khan would suffer “irreparable loss” if he was arrested. Khan’s counsel said that furthermore, being head of the single largest political party, there is an apprehension that his political adversaries and opponents would be able to further their nefarious designs and political ambitions if pre-arrest bail is not granted to the petitioner.
During the hearing, the IHC chief justice asked why the petitioner was trying to bypass the trial courts. At this, Khan’s counsel said that the former prime minister was facing security threats.
Justice Farooq remarked that law and order situation arose when thousands of people gathered outside the courts. Imran’s lawyer argued that people came to the court on their own and were not asked by the PTI.
He continued that on March 18, they were at the judicial complex but were not allowed to enter. The judge remarked that the events that occurred on March 18 were wrong, and the court was aware that Imran faced potential threats.
Advocate General (AG) Islamabad Jahangir Jadoon said that the PTI must cooperate with security authorities. He said that on March 18, the former ruling party brought four to five thousand people and the door of the judicial complex was broken. AG Jadoon maintained that it was the PTI’s responsibility to control their followers.
Then, Justice Farooq asked what the party was to do when the authorities were not providing them with security. He remarked that Imran Khan has genuine security concerns and he had been attacked in the past as well.
Imran Khan’s counsel stated that in all the cases against him, the police were the plaintiff. He continued that he had no objections to going to the judicial complex if proper security was provided. Barrister Safdar informed the court that Imran did not go to the trial court due to “security risks”.
The IHC chief justice asked why did you come to the IHC after bypassing the trial court. He further said that you have to maintain the law and order situation. At this, the IHC bench called Islamabad Advocate General to the rostrum and Justice Aurangzeb said that the court told the chief commissioner many times to provide security [to Imran].
The AG responded that the trial court was shifted from the F-8 Katcheri to the Judicial Complex and the former prime minister did not come out of his car at the court and his party workers lit cars on fire.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2023
Comments
Comments are closed.