AIRLINK 189.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.27%)
BOP 12.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 7.24 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
FCCL 41.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.09%)
FFL 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.58%)
FLYNG 25.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.75%)
HUBC 132.00 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (1.47%)
HUMNL 14.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
KEL 4.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.71%)
KOSM 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.61%)
MLCF 47.90 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (2.05%)
OGDC 209.05 Increased By ▲ 6.30 (3.11%)
PACE 6.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
PAEL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (2.09%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.06%)
PIBTL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.69%)
POWER 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
PPL 176.00 Increased By ▲ 3.79 (2.2%)
PRL 35.15 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.09%)
PTC 24.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.21%)
SEARL 96.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.54%)
SILK 1.12 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.82%)
SSGC 31.80 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (3.99%)
SYM 17.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.06%)
TELE 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.19%)
TPLP 11.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.59%)
TRG 63.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.08%)
WAVESAPP 11.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 3.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.96%)
AIRLINK 189.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.27%)
BOP 12.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 7.24 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
FCCL 41.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.09%)
FFL 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.58%)
FLYNG 25.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.75%)
HUBC 132.00 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (1.47%)
HUMNL 14.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
KEL 4.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.71%)
KOSM 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.61%)
MLCF 47.90 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (2.05%)
OGDC 209.05 Increased By ▲ 6.30 (3.11%)
PACE 6.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
PAEL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (2.09%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.06%)
PIBTL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.69%)
POWER 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
PPL 176.00 Increased By ▲ 3.79 (2.2%)
PRL 35.15 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.09%)
PTC 24.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.21%)
SEARL 96.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.54%)
SILK 1.12 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.82%)
SSGC 31.80 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (3.99%)
SYM 17.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.06%)
TELE 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.19%)
TPLP 11.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.59%)
TRG 63.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.08%)
WAVESAPP 11.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 3.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.96%)
BR100 11,949 Increased By 84.1 (0.71%)
BR30 35,749 Increased By 428.4 (1.21%)
KSE100 113,574 Increased By 772.9 (0.69%)
KSE30 35,392 Increased By 355.4 (1.01%)

KARACHI: The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P), insisting that Karachi’s population is around 35 million, has appealed to all the ethnic groups living in the metropolis to take to the street against “injustice with them by resorting to unfair digital census.”

MQM-P convener Khaliq Maqbool Siddiqui said it was a national consensus that under this unfair digital census the actual population of the city could never be counted.

While the census in Karachi, like other parts of the country, is continuing, the key partner of the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) government at the Centre still sounds dissatisfied. It warned that it would not accept any “manipulated number” of the city population.

Dr Siddiqui also referred to “serious flaws” in the design of the digital census which suggested “ill intention” of the authorities from the day one. He also questioned the role of parties criticising the digital census, saying that practically they were “doing only politics” as they were making no credible practical moves.

“How can one justify the higher number of blocks, set for the digital census, in rural Sindh than in Karachi and other urban areas of the province?” he argued. “Then in Karachi and Hyderabad, one block represents a total of 187 households but in rural Sindh a single block represents 250 households. In a rough calculation, more than five million population of Karachi has been compromised through this design. This is absolutely unjust and unfair count of population.”

The MQM-P leader said that before 1970s, the total population of Hyderabad and Sukkur was not even 40 percent of the Karachi’s population. After the 1970s, he added, the city witnessed a “massive influx” of people due to different local, regional and economic issues.

“Can this be possible that after facing such an influx and immigration of people from different parts of the country and neighbouring countries, the city population started declining? Now we firmly believe that there’s a national consensus that population of Karachi could not be counted correctly under this design of digital census,” he said.

Dr Siddiqui said that it was MQM-P which pushed the authorities to go for another census after serious flaws in the National Census 2017 and if the numbers of urban areas of Sindh are “manipulated through “maneuvering”, then his party would put up a stiff resistance.

Criticising those who, according to him, “are doing politics only for point scoring,” he said that mere lip-service would not help Karachiites.

“Only placing banners for ‘rights of Karachi’ and ‘true population count’ won’t work,” he said. “It demands consistent struggle and political commitment. I appeal to all the ethnic entities living in Karachi to come out of their homes. This injustice in the name of census is not against any single community. It’s against everyone living in Karachi. This is even worse than [what was done before the] East Pakistan debacle.”

Comments

Comments are closed.

Parvez Apr 22, 2023 01:20pm
What he says is correct.....what dilutes it's content is the credibility of the speaker
thumb_up Recommended (0)