AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: Tax experts have urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to correct the errors and omissions of earlier enactments/ notifications through the upcoming Finance Bill 2023.

Tax experts stated that invariably in every Finance Act, there are multiple amendments made to correct the drafting errors and omissions of earlier enactments and these lapses by the Policy Wing of the FBR usually create uncertainty and lead to avoidable litigation.

Tax experts have urged the FBR to improve its track record in the forthcoming budget.

When contacted, Shahid Jami, a Lahore-based tax professional explained with an illustration that when an amendment is intended in any section or schedule of the taxing statute any corresponding amendment required elsewhere is overlooked.

He explained that in 2021 the milk and many other products were made taxable for the levy of sales tax if sold retail in packing under a brand name or trademark. But the key expression of “retail packing” used in Table II of the Sixth Schedule was not defined in section 2 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 containing definitions of such key expressions used in the Act. Obviously, retail packing would mean packing meant for the general body of consumers for their consumption. But it should have been defined especially when related expressions of “retail price” and “retailer” stood defined. He urged that the needful is done in this Finance Bill.

Jami explained that similarly at times an amendment in the Act warrants a corresponding amendment in the relevant SRO but the same is also overlooked. For example through Finance Act 2021 in section 159(1)( c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 the words of “ section 100C “ were substituted with the words of “this Ordinance” but the corresponding amendment in SRO.715(I)/2020 has not been made in Rule 40D(2)(a).

Jami further explained that though FBR in its letter dated 19 April 2023 addressed to the FTO has admitted the anomaly and has also enclosed the draft amending SRO yet the same has not been issued in spite of elapse of almost 40 days after admission. He urged that like in developed countries and even India, the FBR should publish the draft of proposed amendments seeking comments from taxpayers and experts.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.