AGL 38.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
AIRLINK 200.83 Decreased By ▼ -6.94 (-3.34%)
BOP 10.19 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.29%)
CNERGY 6.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-7.2%)
DCL 9.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.1%)
DFML 39.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-3.01%)
DGKC 97.67 Decreased By ▼ -5.79 (-5.6%)
FCCL 35.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-3.44%)
FFBL 86.00 Decreased By ▼ -5.59 (-6.1%)
FFL 13.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-4.45%)
HUBC 130.45 Decreased By ▼ -8.98 (-6.44%)
HUMNL 14.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
KEL 5.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-5.53%)
KOSM 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-7.12%)
MLCF 45.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.68 (-3.55%)
NBP 66.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.38 (-10.01%)
OGDC 221.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-0.52%)
PAEL 38.45 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.89%)
PIBTL 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.34%)
PPL 196.85 Decreased By ▼ -9.00 (-4.37%)
PRL 38.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-2.51%)
PTC 25.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-3.83%)
SEARL 104.50 Decreased By ▼ -5.74 (-5.21%)
TELE 9.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.84%)
TOMCL 36.41 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-4.71%)
TPLP 13.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.94%)
TREET 25.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-4.73%)
TRG 58.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.44 (-4.03%)
UNITY 33.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.73%)
WTL 1.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-7.98%)
BR100 11,896 Decreased By -402.5 (-3.27%)
BR30 37,383 Decreased By -1494.9 (-3.85%)
KSE100 111,070 Decreased By -3790.4 (-3.3%)
KSE30 34,909 Decreased By -1287 (-3.56%)

After reaching their peak in March of last year—at US$441 per ton for South African Richards Bay (API4), international coal prices have been on a decline, the downward trajectory becoming more decisive since Dec-22. Now, in the last week of May, coal prices have been trailing US$110 per ton, down 75 percent since the historic peak that materialized last year. Though still well above the coal price average in 2020 and the 5-year average prior to that, coal prices have fallen significantly since last year, as inventories have grown to meet prevalent demand. Here at home, this is good news.

Cement manufacturers in Pakistan consume coal as a major energy source for production and coal constitutes about 60 percent of their primary costs, hence have a huge bearing on margins. With rising coal prices globally in the immediate aftermath of Russian invasion of Ukraine, cement manufacturers were able to divert their coal procurement from global suppliers to coal suppliers in Afghanistan. Afghan coal was more affordable. With international coal prices now on a decline, more options are opening up.

For cement manufacturers located near the port (South zone players), the decline in international coal prices is a major cost advantage specially since freight rates are also falling. They will find it more feasible to import coal from abroad, than procure it from Afghanistan where they incur inland freight and whose prices have been slow to catch up with the global downward decline in coal prices. Last year when coal prices shot up and Pakistan committed to importing more coal from Afghani coal suppliers, the Afghan government was quick to hike up prices, but they haven’t been as quick to drop them.

Manufacturers in the North are likely to continue to utilize Afghan coal as prices are close to Richards Bay coal and may not benefit from shifting. The only problem now is prevailing LC restrictions that are making most importers nervous about keeping their plants operational as they run short of imported inputs. Though international coal may become more cost effective for cement manufacturers in the south, the benefits may not be accrued until import restrictions ease, whenever that may be.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Az_Iz Jun 01, 2023 04:36am
Even after adjusting for calorific value,?Thar coal is still cheaper.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ch K A Nye Jun 04, 2023 11:50am
@Az_Iz, what about the Sulphur content?
thumb_up Recommended (0)