AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 136.45 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 5.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.37%)
CNERGY 3.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 7.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 45.69 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.62%)
DGKC 78.55 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.04%)
FCCL 29.06 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.59%)
FFBL 56.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.09%)
FFL 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.86%)
HUBC 99.52 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (2.81%)
HUMNL 13.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 3.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.8%)
KOSM 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.27%)
MLCF 37.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.37%)
NBP 67.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.3%)
OGDC 167.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.16%)
PAEL 25.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.75%)
PPL 131.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.28%)
PRL 25.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-2.77%)
PTC 14.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.99%)
SEARL 61.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.8%)
TELE 6.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.43%)
TOMCL 36.41 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.5%)
TPLP 7.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.16%)
TREET 14.01 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TRG 45.00 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.01%)
UNITY 26.01 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.62%)
WTL 1.22 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 9,144 Increased By 1 (0.01%)
BR30 27,337 Increased By 10.6 (0.04%)
KSE100 85,682 Increased By 96.4 (0.11%)
KSE30 26,989 Increased By 4.7 (0.02%)

LAHORE: An Anti Terrorism Court on Monday sought further arguments on the post-arrest bail petitions of nine PTI leaders and workers in the Corpus Commander House attack case on June 19.

Other women suspects included former MNA Alia Hamza, Sanam Javed, Tayyaba Abmreen Raja, Maryam Mazari, Irum Akmal, Sabuhi Inam, Khillat Aziz, Mumtaz Bibi, Huma Saeed, Ayesha Masood, Maha Masood and Khadija Nadeem.

The court also adjourned till June 19 the bail petitions of 46 other male suspects involved in the Corpus Commander House attack case.

The court observed that all the bail petitions would be decided altogether.

Earlier, counsel of Khadija Shah, a granddaughter of former army chief Asif Nawaz Janjua concluded his arguments.

The counsel stated that his client was kept in illegal custody before the process of the identification parade.

On a court query the counsel argued that the identity of the petitioner was already made public through media reports. Therefore, he said, the process of the identification parade became useless.

He also said the police failed to recover anything from the custody of the petitioner. To another court’s query, the counsel said the police did not recover the mobile phone of the petitioner.

The court at this observed that apparently the police lost important evidence in the case. The counsel further argued that neither the petitioner was nominated in the FIR nor her alleged role in the occurrence was clear. He said it was a fit case of further inquiry.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.