AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 129.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.36%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.05%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-3.02%)
DCL 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-4.36%)
DFML 40.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.09%)
DGKC 80.96 Decreased By ▼ -2.81 (-3.35%)
FCCL 32.77 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 74.43 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-1.38%)
FFL 11.74 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.35%)
HUBC 109.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-0.88%)
HUMNL 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-5.56%)
KEL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.48%)
KOSM 7.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-8.1%)
MLCF 38.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-2.99%)
NBP 63.51 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (5.34%)
OGDC 194.69 Decreased By ▼ -4.97 (-2.49%)
PAEL 25.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.53%)
PIBTL 7.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.52%)
PPL 155.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.56%)
PRL 25.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.52%)
PTC 17.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-5.2%)
SEARL 78.65 Decreased By ▼ -3.79 (-4.6%)
TELE 7.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-5.42%)
TOMCL 33.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-2.26%)
TPLP 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-7.28%)
TREET 16.27 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-6.87%)
TRG 58.22 Decreased By ▼ -3.10 (-5.06%)
UNITY 27.49 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.72%)
BR100 10,445 Increased By 38.5 (0.37%)
BR30 31,189 Decreased By -523.9 (-1.65%)
KSE100 97,798 Increased By 469.8 (0.48%)
KSE30 30,481 Increased By 288.3 (0.95%)

KARACHI: In view of the recent news about the SBP’s now discontinued Temporary Economic Refinance Facility (TERF), Pakistan Textile Council believes it is pertinent to put some facts on record.

The SBP had launched TERF as part of the Covid package in April-May 2020, with a sunset date of March 2021. Those were unprecedented times. Pakistan like the rest of the world also went about supporting its manufacturing and social bases. This package, however, added to its productive industrial capacity with more employment opportunities. It helped push the economic frontier.

It may be recalled that the SBP’s MPC in its May 15, 2020, meeting had reduced the policy rate by 100 bps to 8%, after a cut of 525 bps in the last two months. The LSM had witnessed a steep decline of 23 percent (y/y) in March, 2020. In trying to outpace the contracting impact of reduced economic activity the rate was further cut to 7% on June 25, 2020.

It is in that context the SBP had launched various initiatives including TERF to put a floor under the falling economic activity and consumer confidence.

The TERF was well defined, focused with the aim to reach wider economy and give the investors capacity to not only tide over Covid uncertainty but to make them better prepared for the post-Covid era. It was successful in achieving all its objectives.

The TERF financed machinery only, not land, not building, just new machinery imported or local against import LCs or inland LCs. The TERF funding for equipment had a multiplier effect and brought in additional investment in building and ancillary facilities etc. It may further be noted the TERF loans were priced at a maximum of 7%, whereas the policy rate was cut to 7% in June 2020.

The TERF advantage put Pakistan on a spree of capital investment whose benefits would keep accruing in the coming years. Subsequent surge in exports can also be, at least in part, explained by the newer, more productive and energy efficient TERF funded investments.

Like other sectors textile sector invested in its entire value chain and that has contributed to better products, more capacity and higher exports.

It again highlights the larger issue of non-availability of long-term funding at rates where an exporter can invest and still be competitive internationally. The TERF addressed it productively, but it was a one-off event. Pakistan needs to work on real issues like development of capital markets where long-term capital can be made available at competitive rates.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Pakistani1 Jul 09, 2023 04:16pm
The defined use of Terf per the article were "The TERF financed machinery only, not land, not building, just new machinery imported or local against import LCs or inland LCs.". Did the companies who received TERF financing use the funds for the machinery? Is this being investigated for every recipient?
thumb_up Recommended (0)