AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Senator Rashid Rabbani seems to have responded to International Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s) meetings with political stakeholders in Pakistan, including PPP and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), in a highly inappropriate manner by describing this development as “an erosion of political sovereignty”.

How come has the learned senator described the situation as “the return of East India Company when notables were asked to support the Company’s policies?” I urge him to identify and explain who was actually asking the so-called notables to support Company’s policies in the 18th and 19th centuries in the undivided sub-continent.

The senator is fully aware of the fact that the incumbent government had been making efforts day in, day out to successfully persuade the IMF to unlock its bailout programme—the criticality of which cannot be overemphasized. In other words, it was not top or lower-ranked IMF official but the prime minister himself who had been calling on the IMF MD time and again or on very many occasions, repeatedly, urging her to end Fund’s protracted procrastination over the future of programme.

It is quite out of ordinary that PPP, which is part of the present coalition setup in the country, has made its position on this development public through an individual senator.

Former finance minister Salim Mandviwala and incumbent federal commerce minister Naveed Qamar comprised the PPP team that formally met the IMF officials on Friday. I’m sure neither had described the situation as “the return of the East India Company…” before the representatives of lender of last resort. How interesting it is that the PPP wants to retain the possession of a cake and eat it, too.

Ashiq Husain Tiwana (Rawalpindi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.