AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

Recently, it was reported that Indus Motor Company – the assembler of Toyota-brand vehicles and parts manufacturer in Pakistan – is exporting a certain part to Egypt after an agreement with the foreign entity.

The CEO, Ali Asghar Jamali, said at the time if Toyota Egypt’s confidence is built, “we may be asked to export more parts”.

However, the development drew the criticism of many within and outside the industry. Many said Pakistan’s auto industry ‘lacks innovation and has not developed’ in the many years it has operated despite getting ‘favours’ from the government in the form of high duties on imported vehicles.

There were questions as to why it took an automobile company 30 years to begin exports.

Here, it is important to understand the structure of the auto sector companies operating in Pakistan.

Let us start with IMC. It is a joint venture between a few companies – the House of Habib in Pakistan, Japan’s Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) and Toyota Tsusho Corporation – and was incorporated in 1989. However, it was not until May 1993 that it first started commercial production.

Indus Motor Company jacks up Toyota car prices yet again

Other major players in Pakistan are similarly structured – the shareholding pattern may be different. They are not completely indigenous, but are anchored by a strong foreign parent company.

The business model is pretty simple. Make and/or procure cheap parts wherever possible and then sell them to the consumer.

Their success is determined by their bottom-line figure. Indus Motor, for example, posted a profit-after-tax of Rs13.7 billion in 2019 (year ended June 30), Rs5 billion in 2020, Rs12.8 billion in 2021, and then hit Rs15.8 billion in 2022. Just for humour – its profit in 2014 was Rs3.8 billion.

No one will question if the company’s done better with blips here and there. The year 2023 will probably not be the one it will look forward to.

Pakistan’s Toyota assembler shuts production plant yet again

So what?

It depends on a company’s strategy at a given point in time what they wish to do – offer low-priced products compared to competition and penetrate the market or offer a product at a premium and hope the ‘superior’ quality would get enough customers.

This DNA or business model of the parent company is inevitably passed on to it’s ‘baby’ companies.

However, in countries like Pakistan with timid governments, zero to no enforcement of legislation, the business model is not the only thing to worry about.

For any auto company in the country, it becomes difficult for them to push/convince their parent that Pakistan deserves heavy investment.

YoY: Pakistan’s trade deficit shrinks 43% to $27.6bn in FY23

This begs the question then, why make large investments in machinery when the same product can be made more cost-effectively somewhere else?

This makes perfect economic sense.

But this argument misses one key part of the equation – the country’s own interests.

And here is where Pakistan has suffered. Here is where one needs people who have a strong will and an understanding of what would drive these companies to localise and eventually export. This aim needs years to complete, and immense consistency. It needs vision, and the country’s interest at heart.

Over the years, governments have failed to monitor the purely-capitalistic business model of Pakistan’s automobile and other sectors. Everyone has looked out for their personal interest, and the government has turned a blind eye.

In cricket terms, if you bowl a lousy full-toss, they will take you to the cleaners. This is the nature of the game.

Companies like these have qualified professionals. They know the game inside out and work to benefit their own companies. In developed countries, however, so does the opposition. Their regulators counter the moves.

In Pakistan, the opposition, incumbent government and the authorities aren’t either equipped with the knowledge and if they are, tend to give in by bowling big ‘no-balls’.

So what did Pakistan do? It opted for the easiest way out.

Become an import-happy nation, keep the dollar steady and tamed, and let the companies do what they want to maximise their profit. It came at a heavy cost for the country, though.

When its easy to import, why bother trying to produce at home?

For instance, despite being one of the biggest producers of milk, we have imported high-value products such as cheese.

This is where the role of regulators and the government comes in. They need to keep a check over these businesses, and implement policies that look for a balance between importing what is needed, and producing locally what is required.

It may take years, but a start has to be made.

However, it doesn’t seem like anyone’s ready to take that first step — everyone wants to just join the race without changing the rules, rules that go firmly against Pakistan’s long-term interests.

The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners

Bilal Hussain

The writer is a Reporter at Business Recorder (Digital)

Comments

Comments are closed.

Tashbih Syed Jul 21, 2023 06:07am
Shame on Indus motor
thumb_up Recommended (0)
test Jul 21, 2023 09:28pm
Incorrect: The responsibility lays with the govt to ensure Pakistan's long-term interests are kept in mind. Correct: The responsibility lays with the elite class to ensure elite class's long term interests which are backdoor comissions and under the table deals with the foreign assembling plants who are looting the countries from the past 3-4 decades. Remember these: 1-Elite Republic of Pakistan 2-Elite Bank of Pakistan 3-Elite Chamber of Industrialists 4-Elite Housing Authority 5-Elite Forces of Pakistan 6-Elite Court of Pakistan 7-Elite Parliament of Pakistan There is a common pattern from Liaquat to Ayub to Bhutto to Zia to Benazir to Musharraf to Zardari to Nawaz to Imran which is they were all chosen by the elite class to beg for dollars. They are meant to beg for dollars so that the collective elite class can maintain their lavish lifestyle at the expense of suffering of a common who has poor quality jobs with less salaries because there is no manufacturing at all in the Pakistan
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Haq Jul 21, 2023 10:46pm
IMC & ministry of industries (that is on Japanese assembles payroll) are both curse on our automobile market
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jul 24, 2023 04:47pm
The politicians take the easy route, when it comes to the economy. Subsidize, import, consume and then look for loans to pay for it. Every time a loan comes through, celebrate as good news, and start thumping the chest, for having averted a crisis.
thumb_up Recommended (0)