AGL 38.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.18%)
AIRLINK 203.50 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.24%)
BOP 10.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.38%)
CNERGY 6.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.99%)
DCL 9.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.36%)
DFML 39.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.42%)
DGKC 98.51 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.44%)
FCCL 35.26 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.86%)
FFBL 87.75 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (1.53%)
FFL 13.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.22%)
HUBC 130.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-0.89%)
HUMNL 13.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.5%)
KEL 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.96%)
KOSM 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.16%)
MLCF 46.16 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.25%)
NBP 61.30 Decreased By ▼ -5.08 (-7.65%)
OGDC 220.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.03%)
PAEL 39.10 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.61%)
PIBTL 8.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.03%)
PPL 197.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-0.44%)
PRL 39.05 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.05%)
PTC 25.60 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.51%)
SEARL 105.50 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (2.38%)
TELE 8.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.66%)
TOMCL 36.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.63%)
TPLP 13.85 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.73%)
TREET 24.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.39%)
TRG 57.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.41%)
UNITY 33.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.01%)
WTL 1.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.75%)
BR100 11,878 Decreased By -12.4 (-0.1%)
BR30 37,146 Decreased By -210.2 (-0.56%)
KSE100 110,526 Decreased By -543.9 (-0.49%)
KSE30 34,745 Decreased By -163.7 (-0.47%)

LAHORE: Chairman PTI Imran Khan has approached the Lahore High Court against a de facto ban on the coverage of all material relating to him on the electronic media.

The petitioner through his counsel contended that there is a misconceived ban airing/broadcasting of any content regarding the petitioner.

He said that the fact of the ban is obvious from viewing the television screens where anchorpersons uttering the petitioner’s name are censored and his name and images are removed.

It pleads that the de facto ban is a misconceived purported implementation of a general directive to the television channels issued by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), which has not been communicated to the petitioner.

He argued that the impugned ban curbs the fundamental rights of the petitioner and also denies him the opportunity to publicly express his views to his party workers and the general public.

He, therefore, asked the court to declare the impugned ban on the coverage of the petitioner unconstitutional.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.