AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

Saudi crown prince and de facto ruler Mohammad bin Salman’s recent interview to Fox TV was a classing exercise in strategic ambiguity, saying plenty yet leaving more questions than answers, and allowing all stakeholders to interpret it according to their own politics.

So when he said “we hope that we will reach a place, that it will ease the life of the Palestinians (and) get Israel as a player in the Middle East”, the American establishment took it as an endorsement of the Abraham Accords and a sign that Saudi recognition of Israel was very much on the table.

The Democrats are already salivating at the thought of a formal normalisation giving Joe Biden’s re-election hopes a shot in the arm.

Yet even before that he said, “For us, the Palestinian issue is very important… we need to solve that part”, confirming to occupied territories that Riyadh would demand a better deal for them, in addition to its own nuclear energy ambitions of course, before this diplomatic song and dance can move any further.

And for Tel Aviv, especially Benjamin Netanyahu struggling with outright revolt against his extremist, extreme right coalition government’s assault on the judiciary’s sovereignty, the most meaningful bit was when MbS said, “If we have a breakthrough, reaching a deal that gives the Palestinians their needs and (making) the region calm, we’ve got to work with whoever’s there”. Especially that there had been “good negotiations” so far, and “every day, we get closer”.

Now the embattled prime minister can at least begin to counter the public backlash, complete with social society and former PMs calling for his head amid a historic flight of capital from the country, with the narrative that, with the Muslim embrace, he’s making Israel more secure than at any point in its history.

But he can’t have that security without exchanging ambassadors with Saudi Arabia, and that, for all intents and purposes, will demand substantial concessions towards the so-called two-state solution.

Yet his hyper conservative coalition will fall apart the minute he concedes so much as an inch. Further disenfranchising Palestinians, mainly by gobbling up more land, is the glue that holds the far-right parties together in the administration, after all, and the main reason to clip the Supreme Court’s powers.

Why do you think the Israeli press ran reports of senior Likud party parliamentarians warning him against making any concessions regarding Palestinian sovereignty over East Jerusalem, Gaza and the West Bank in talks with and about the Saudis on the sidelines of the UN general assembly?

This is only one small part of the new realities of international politics that MbS is most likely leveraging as Arab states are poised to redefine the region’s political and diplomatic calculus. There could be no bigger proof of America’s rapidly decreasing footprint in the region than China getting Iran and Saudi Arabia to bury the hatchet, even de-escalate in Syria.

In fact, the arch rivals aren’t just going to work together under the BRICS umbrella, there’s also chatter of a potential multi-billion dollar Saudi investment in Iran’s oil and gas industry, nudged by Moscow and Beijing, to bind them in long-term economic interests that both hold dear.

The old Saudi-US oil-for-security deal, held since King Abdulaziz and President Roosevelt shook hands on board a US warship in the Red Sea in 1945, no longer holds as Riyadh openly partners with Moscow in Opec-plus to cut oil supplies in defiance of Washington’s pleas to reduce oil prices.

And Israel has also changed. It can no longer pretend to be the only “truly democratic and stable country” in the Middle East. Netanyahu’s attempt to hold power by stitching together the most aggressive, conservative, extremist government in the country’s history has led him to pass a controversial law limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to overturn decisions made by the cabinet.

Traditionally, the court has acted as a check on religious influence on public life and political business, Israel’s atrocities in the west bank, and policies that favour Jews over Arabs.

The move against the top court triggered the worst riots ever seen in Israel. People from across the social and political spectrum, except for the radical-right ruling alliance, have blocked roads and protested for months. As many as 10,000 military reservists have declared that they will not join their units if Netanyahu’s “judicial reforms” are confirmed.

Even the old guard of the security establishment has rebelled. In a letter made public on 31 August 2023, several prominent former officials, including two old chiefs of the powerful internal security service Shin Bet, wrote to US President Biden urging him not to meet Netanyahu because it would mean “legitimising the government coup”. They accused the PM of “causing severe damage” to Israel, especially the vital “strategic relationship” with Washington.

This crisis of confidence has triggered a feverish capital flight from the country as well. Israel’s finance ministry reported a few weeks ago that foreign investment in the last three months dropped by 60pc year-on-year. And just days ago Netanyahu addressed an empty hall at the UN general assembly as almost all heads of state and senior international diplomats chose to boycott the session.

Saudi Arabia’s oil – one-fourth of global reserves – has earned it the title “central bank of black gold” and long enabled it to punch above its weight in regional politics and global affairs.

From financing the Yom Kippur war, engineering the Opec oil embargo, supporting the Afghan mujahideen, bankrolling Yemen’s Colonel Ali Abdullah Saleh, Pakistan’s General Zia and Jordan’s Hashemite rulers all the way to arbitrating regional conflicts including the recent carnage in Syria, Saudi petrodollars have given it the financial firepower and influence to dictate war and peace far and wide – quintessential Riyal Politik.

Now it is once again taking centre stage as the region weighs the merits of going all out in the matter of recognizing Israel as a way of turning the page on seven and a half decades of conflict that got the Palestinians no closer to their dream of return.

If the chips fall in the right places, Pakistan may well get in on the action and join the debate about Israel as well, almost two decades after the Turks convinced General Musharraf to send foreign minister Khurshid Kasuri to meet his Israeli counterpart in Istanbul in a failed attempt to test the waters.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Az_Iz Sep 28, 2023 06:01am
The Saudi ambassador to Palestine went to the West Bank by crossing the land border and met the Palestinians. He also assured them that any deal with Israel will be based on Arab peace initiative. While it appears to be a step in the right direction, let’s hope that it is not a smokescreen, to keep the Palestinians quiet.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 28, 2023 06:16am
The US said today, that normalization with KSA should have a significant Palestinian component. Whatever that means is not clear. Let’s hope, it is not a pie in the sky, to keep the Palestinians quiet.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Sep 28, 2023 11:16am
The urgency in the change of diplomatic and economic relations is visible all around the world and is the stuff of ideological analysis for those who are languishing on cloud 9 and will be left behind. The thought behind this concern is economic recession, climate change, food security, water scarcity, technology transfer, health, and much more that will ensure the continuation of civilization. The fact is that time is opportune and much benefit is forthcoming from participating in international economics and trade, but for third-world countries and their opportunist leaders, this may be usual news and with their myopic opinion and qualifications, they will certainly spell doom for their people. It's common sense after all, do we revel in ideological stances and refuse to improve relations with our foes? Or do we open trade relations, investment, and technology transfer with our supposed foes and improve our economy to sustain the 240 million population?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 28, 2023 04:44pm
@KU, one should not throw principles out the window for economic gains. Many countries were against apertheid in SA, although they did not have any ethnic or any other link with the people in SA. They took a stand although none of them were perfect themselves. They could also have benefited by taking the side of the apartheid regime, but decided to forgo such benefits. And today they all can be proud.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Sep 28, 2023 04:56pm
@Az_Iz, the principle or moral ground stand will always be there to fight for, the issue is the extreme stands that we take that hurts the economy and people. The SA example is a good one because although everyone was against apartheid, yet countries were trading and investing in SA, and eventually their principal stand on apartheid was vindicated because SA knew they could not survive in the international economy with a racist mindset.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 29, 2023 03:07am
@KU, those who were engaging with SA were mostly the Europeans in general and US and UK in particular, under the pretext of constructive engagement, as a cover.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 29, 2023 03:16am
@KU, the global south which was much weaker and poorer back then, did not have much contact with apertheid regime, and for which everyone should be proud. Most of the West did have relationship with it. Which as time went by and it became untenable to sustain, they also backed out.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 29, 2023 03:31am
@KU, almost nobody from the poor third world countries had any contact with apertheid SA. They did not benefit by establishing relations. No one regrets that decision now or before. In fact everyone agrees, it was the right thing to do and everyone is proud of it.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 29, 2023 03:45am
Israel went along with the Oslo accords. Got some benefits out of it from the Palestinians them, making them do the security work for it. It also used it to get diplomatic recognition from some countries who were reluctant to do so. And then ran the accords into ground, blaming the Palestinians. Something similar appears to be happening. Saudi ambassador to Palestine was was allowed to enter West Bank by land border, making it appear that it is OK with Palestine being recognized as a state. US wants Palestinian issue to be a significant component of any deal between KSA and Israel. Once that is done, once again the Palestinian issue could get relegated to the background with commitments from everyone to work towards a two state solution.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Sep 29, 2023 03:49am
Israel agreed to not annex Palestinian territory, but continues to build settlements. In short, the promise not to annex the territory, effectively useless. Something similar is going to happen now. Maybe everyone will resolve to work for Palestinian independence, tirelessly, so the Palestinians don’t make too much noise.
thumb_up Recommended (0)