AIRLINK 207.50 Increased By ▲ 7.21 (3.6%)
BOP 10.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.14%)
CNERGY 7.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 34.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.14%)
FFL 17.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.55%)
FLYNG 25.15 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.21%)
HUBC 129.05 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (0.97%)
HUMNL 14.25 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (3.19%)
KEL 4.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1%)
KOSM 6.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.28%)
MLCF 44.88 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.58%)
OGDC 221.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.34%)
PACE 7.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.96%)
PAEL 42.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
PIAHCLA 17.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.09%)
PIBTL 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.71%)
POWER 9.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.44%)
PPL 191.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-0.64%)
PRL 43.59 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (5.04%)
PTC 25.33 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (3.64%)
SEARL 103.20 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (1.91%)
SILK 1.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.9%)
SSGC 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.76%)
SYM 18.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.75%)
TELE 9.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.52%)
TPLP 13.30 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.68%)
TRG 70.10 Increased By ▲ 3.91 (5.91%)
WAVESAPP 10.58 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.47%)
WTL 1.83 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (2.81%)
YOUW 4.05 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.25%)
BR100 12,061 Increased By 21.1 (0.17%)
BR30 36,841 Increased By 152.6 (0.42%)
KSE100 114,840 Increased By 35.7 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,057 Decreased By -45.6 (-0.13%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a serving Brigadier and observed that the court cannot pass an order for any action taken against a person under the Army Act.

The court while dismissing a petition of Ummaira Saleem, who approached the court for recovery of her husband Brigadier Akhtar Subhan under the custody of military and being investigated under Section 2(1)(d) of the Army Act, said the Article 199(3) of the Constitution clearly bars the jurisdiction of this court to resolve the matters involved in this petition.

The court said the provisions of the Army Act are protected under Article 8(3)(a) of the Constitution from being challenged on the ground of inconsistency with the fundamental rights contained in Chapter I, Part II of the Constitution.

The court, therefore, said non-compliance of the provisions of Article 10(2) of the Constitution could not invalidate the arrest and detention of accused officers under the Army Act.

The court observed that writ of habeas corpus is only maintainable if a person is detained without lawful authority in an unlawful manner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.