AGL 39.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-1.23%)
AIRLINK 128.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-0.59%)
BOP 6.83 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.19%)
CNERGY 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (5.35%)
DCL 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
DFML 41.09 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.66%)
DGKC 82.18 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (1.51%)
FCCL 33.10 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.01%)
FFBL 74.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.05%)
FFL 11.92 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.53%)
HUBC 109.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.07%)
HUMNL 14.12 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.69%)
KEL 5.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.69%)
KOSM 7.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.11%)
MLCF 39.20 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.55%)
NBP 63.99 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.76%)
OGDC 193.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-0.74%)
PAEL 25.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.74%)
PIBTL 7.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.35%)
PPL 153.20 Decreased By ▼ -2.25 (-1.45%)
PRL 26.00 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.81%)
PTC 17.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 81.40 Increased By ▲ 2.75 (3.5%)
TELE 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.67%)
TOMCL 33.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.95%)
TPLP 8.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.36 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.55%)
TRG 56.86 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-2.34%)
UNITY 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.16%)
BR100 10,520 Increased By 74.5 (0.71%)
BR30 31,136 Decreased By -53.1 (-0.17%)
KSE100 98,362 Increased By 563.6 (0.58%)
KSE30 30,733 Increased By 252.6 (0.83%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a serving Brigadier and observed that the court cannot pass an order for any action taken against a person under the Army Act.

The court while dismissing a petition of Ummaira Saleem, who approached the court for recovery of her husband Brigadier Akhtar Subhan under the custody of military and being investigated under Section 2(1)(d) of the Army Act, said the Article 199(3) of the Constitution clearly bars the jurisdiction of this court to resolve the matters involved in this petition.

The court said the provisions of the Army Act are protected under Article 8(3)(a) of the Constitution from being challenged on the ground of inconsistency with the fundamental rights contained in Chapter I, Part II of the Constitution.

The court, therefore, said non-compliance of the provisions of Article 10(2) of the Constitution could not invalidate the arrest and detention of accused officers under the Army Act.

The court observed that writ of habeas corpus is only maintainable if a person is detained without lawful authority in an unlawful manner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.