AIRLINK 203.00 Increased By ▲ 2.71 (1.35%)
BOP 10.51 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
CNERGY 7.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
FCCL 35.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.46%)
FFL 17.57 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.86%)
FLYNG 26.02 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (4.71%)
HUBC 129.86 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (1.6%)
HUMNL 13.86 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.36%)
KEL 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.4%)
KOSM 7.12 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.28%)
MLCF 44.99 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.83%)
OGDC 224.74 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (1.17%)
PACE 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.89%)
PAEL 43.20 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 17.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.29%)
PIBTL 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.29%)
POWER 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.77%)
PPL 194.80 Increased By ▲ 2.07 (1.07%)
PRL 41.54 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.1%)
PTC 24.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.53%)
SEARL 102.49 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (1.2%)
SILK 1.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.86%)
SSGC 44.25 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.87%)
SYM 18.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.32%)
TELE 9.58 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.42%)
TPLP 13.22 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.07%)
TRG 68.43 Increased By ▲ 2.24 (3.38%)
WAVESAPP 10.60 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.66%)
WTL 1.81 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (1.69%)
YOUW 4.05 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.25%)
BR100 12,132 Increased By 92.4 (0.77%)
BR30 37,151 Increased By 462.3 (1.26%)
KSE100 115,709 Increased By 905.1 (0.79%)
KSE30 36,353 Increased By 250.3 (0.69%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a serving Brigadier and observed that the court cannot pass an order for any action taken against a person under the Army Act.

The court while dismissing a petition of Ummaira Saleem, who approached the court for recovery of her husband Brigadier Akhtar Subhan under the custody of military and being investigated under Section 2(1)(d) of the Army Act, said the Article 199(3) of the Constitution clearly bars the jurisdiction of this court to resolve the matters involved in this petition.

The court said the provisions of the Army Act are protected under Article 8(3)(a) of the Constitution from being challenged on the ground of inconsistency with the fundamental rights contained in Chapter I, Part II of the Constitution.

The court, therefore, said non-compliance of the provisions of Article 10(2) of the Constitution could not invalidate the arrest and detention of accused officers under the Army Act.

The court observed that writ of habeas corpus is only maintainable if a person is detained without lawful authority in an unlawful manner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.