AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has held that the mere recommendation of a person for a civil award does not create any right in his favour for the conferment of such an award.

The court directed the Secretary Cabinet Division and others to prepare a proper mechanism for the recommendation process for awarding civil awards.

The court also advised the respondents to evolve the mechanism as per the provisions of the Decorations Act, 1975, the instructions (general instructions and legal provision for making recommendations for Pakistan Civil Awards), the notification issued by the Cabinet Division on June 13, 2022, and the rules of business, 1973.

The court passed this order in a petition of Khushdil Khan Malik who approached the court for not awarding him a civil award even after the recommendations of the Director General Educational Institutions (DGEI) passed in his favour.

LHC explains why enrolment thru daily wages can’t necessarily be a route to regular employment in public sector

The DGEI selected the petitioner’s name in recognition of his long meritorious services and numerous achievements in the field of public service where he rendered services for the welfare of people and was strongly recommended for civil award of “Sitara-i-Imtiaz”.

However, this recommendation was then forwarded to the Ministry of Defence which did not further forward the same to the Cabinet Division; therefore, the petitioner’s name could not be considered for conferment of the Award.

The court observed that merely nominating the name of the petitioner by his parent department to the relevant division does not create any legal or fundamental right in his favour.

The court said that the petitioner, who was well aware of the fact, had approached this court after a considerable delay of about five months. The court added that he remained silent during the intervening period and failed to give any satisfactory answer in this regard, as well.

The court further observed that this court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution can only declare the pre-existing right, but cannot create a new right through a declaration, as consideration for conferment of award is not a pre-existing right of the petitioner.

The court; therefore, directed the office to send a copy of the judgment to the secretary to the prime minister, secretary, cabinet division, Islamabad, secretary ministry of planning, development & reforms, secretary ministry of defence and director general, Federal Government Educational Institutions for compliance.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.