AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

For a very long time, the government has been supplying gas at a subsidized rate to fertilizer companies (mainly to urea manufacturing plants where natural gas is the chief raw material), to provide fertilizer at a cheaper rate to farmers to ensure food affordability and security in the country. However, the full benefit of low gas prices is not being passed on to the farmer, as fertilizer companies in Pakistan have historically made abnormal profits (relative to similar businesses in other countries).

Experts are raising questions on the mode of the subsidy–some suggest that a better model could be to provide direct subsidy to the farmers. However, given the poor governance in the country, policymakers fear that model could fail – as is the case of providing direct subsidy on DAP fertilizer. The use of technology and other innovative methods can improve governance, and that topic requires some deliberation.

This article highlights the growing delta between the urea market price (at which farmers buy) to the dealer transfer price (at which fertilizer companies sell), and today, local urea prices are almost at par with the international prices, while the major benefit of low gas prices is in essence being accrued by dealers (the middlemen).

The urea dealer transfer price per 50 kg bag ranges from Rs3,300 to Rs3,500 (avg is approx. Rs3,400) and the latest market price ranges between Rs4,900 and Rs5,300. The usual profit of a dealer is Rs150-200, and at the prevailing rates, dealers are making profit of Rs1,500. There is no rational reason for such hike in prices and dealers are not paying any tax on the exuberant income – unlike the fertilizer companies which pay full income tax on their abnormal profits.

That is the worse outcome. Dealers say that the prices are increasing due to shortage, as the urea stock (inventory with fertilizer companies) in November is at the second lowest (120k tons) of the last ten years during high demand wheat sowing season.

The general perception is that shortage is due to smuggling of urea to Afghanistan and beyond to the Central Asia. Thus, part of gas subsidy is enjoyed by importing countries at the expense of Pakistani taxpayers and farmers. And the shortage shall be met by importing Urea or gas (RLNG) to make urea at home. In both cases, the government (taxpayers) is providing subsidies.

Government, farmers, and taxpayers are the losers in this game while dealers are the key beneficiaries. No one knows how much inventory dealers hold – either they are hoarding in or have smuggled out. Without a robust track and trace system, there is no way to track the stocks, and dealers resist its implementation.

That is the stock of the situation. Farmer is paying high price while fertilizer companies and middlemen are accruing profits. With domestic prices converging to the international rates, one simple solution is to increase the gas price for fertilizer companies to bring the dealer transfer price close to the market price.

The point is that farmers are already paying high price, it is optimal to increase the gas price to pass on the benefit to government of Sindh and companies involved in the gas supply value chain. And the federal government must provide lower subsidy on imported Urea or imported RLNG to be provided to marginal fertilizer manufacturers.

Perhaps the market price is set where it is at equilibrium to smuggling price, and with increase in dealer transfer price that incentive to hoard or smuggle shall diminish as well.

There are three big companies in the Urea business which in total have ten manufacturing plants. There is varying pricing for different plants, as they fall under separate policies. The pricing is based on feedstock and fuel. The price varies from Rs580/mmbtu to Rs1,600/mmbtu in these plants (barring one Engro plant where concessional feedstock price is to end in June 2024), and the final product is almost homogeneous and is sold at similar pricing.

According to Optimus Capital calculations, if all the fertilizer feedstock and fuel prices are set at Rs1,600/mmbtu, at last year’s average gross margins and blend, the dealer transfer prices are coming in the range of Rs4,000 to 4,400 per mmbtu while the market price is hovering around Rs5,000.

The government should do apply a track and trace system to track dealers’ inventory and to curb smuggling. The next step is to implement track and trace in letter and spirit. That is to track dealers’ inventory and build in the date of farmers buying it. That would help to build a system of direct subsidies to farmer and normalize profits of fertilizer companies.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Author Image

Ali Khizar

Ali Khizar is the Director of Research at Business Recorder. His Twitter handle is @AliKhizar

Comments

Comments are closed.

Arif Dec 18, 2023 09:55am
There can be no price manipulation by dealers without fertilizer manufacturers support just like no dealer can charge premium on new cars without car assemblers connivance.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Cool boy Dec 18, 2023 10:23am
Only in a country like Pakistan coal or petcoke isn't used to make fertilizer only imported or local gas .....
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ali Kuli Dec 18, 2023 11:28am
With reference to the OpeEd written by Ali Khizar: Fertilizer: a subsidy for the dealers? The best way to solve this is to Include a subsidy certificate with a unique number printed on it packed inside the bag. It should be somewhere in the middle of the bag. An Expiry date of 6 months may be added to the certificate to discourage hoarding. The unique number will identify the manufacturing company and date of issue. The farmer can then deposit the certificate into his bank account. Now, only the user who opens the bag will be able to receive the certificate and cash it. If someone tries to steal the certificate from the bag, the bag will become damaged and unsaleable. However, the government will need to ensure that the certificates are packed inside the bags and not short circuited by corrupt people directly to the bank. In case of fraud, the person whose account has the deposit will become liable. The government will also be able to transparently see who is enjoying the subsidy
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ali Kuli Dec 18, 2023 11:29am
Ali Khizar is more or less correct, but the theft is more convoluted than he imagines. Basically, the subidy is stolen by the Manufacturing Company, government officials and politicians, who supply the bags to the dealer for a cash top on the sale, say Rs200, and then later sold by the dealers to the farmer for an inflated amount, say Rs. 1000.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Dec 18, 2023 01:37pm
The subsidy model is designed to make billions for fertilizer companies, policymakers and dealers, while farmers bear the brunt of high costs. This season has seen 35k cost of sowing alone while equal amount will be spent till harvest. Simply corrupt and unprofessional state of affairs.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Sanjay Kumar Dec 18, 2023 06:09pm
Sir Look from dealers angle..Fertilizer companies forced Us to sell Dap with Urea ..they Have ratios usualy 1:6 One Dap and 6 Urea We lose money In Dap while make profits from Urea at the 4200 rs..They are mafias and artificial shortage By Companies maneger Who chooses Whom to Give Allocations of Urea..
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Dec 18, 2023 08:15pm
A vibrant media, is a positive sign, exposing corrupt practices in society.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
mujib Dec 18, 2023 11:06pm
Well written sir with few suggestion,,,there is no will of govt to extent an helping hand to farmer, otherwise The system is so ressilence that even one inch of land is recorded with patwari for abyana,etc,now in the computing era,,,,each farmer can be approached and helped out,,,,
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Rehman Dec 18, 2023 11:10pm
Totally disagreed It doesn’t mean that by increasing urea prices bring close to marekt price will help out government to generate revenue.if prices gone up black market will also jump.dap prices are equal to international market and increased from 8000 rupee to 14000 rupee. But now dap is available in 2000 rupee black. Its just a game of demand and supply There js some chances to reduce black marketing by increasing prices of urea because if prices become same in our region Smuggling would be slowed down But if we see dap which is equal to international price has also be blacked in our market I think its just a fertilizers companies game to earn profit in off season and to give profits to dealers in wheat season
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Make in Pakistan Dec 19, 2023 02:13pm
No one is losing here but the consumer of food staple - the farmer is spending more but will get better support price.
thumb_up Recommended (0)